I'm pretty sure that is accurate. Not exactly a fair comparison... -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:47 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Ubnt_users] Ubiquity Rocket M2 with Tranzeo CPE
Was that an accurate guess, or do you not remember the Tranzeo stuff either? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote: > I was thinking the same thing... > > Regards, > Chuck > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: >> >> Interesting. Was the 19 in the model a 19dbi? So you went from an >> 8dbi Ubiquiti to 19dbi Tranzeo? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote: >> >>Have you had any situation where a Tranzeo worked at a customer site and >> >> Ubiquiti didn't? >> > >> > Having that right now. MT RB411 AP with XR2. UBNT Nanstation M2 >> > Connection rate all over the place and on a video stream drops clear down >> > to >> > 3.3M with 45% CCQ. Throw a OLD Tranzeo CPG-19 at the site and get a solid >> > 48 MB 90% CCQ. I have seen this on this sector mostly and it was all >> > replaced in DEC due to ICE getting in the RB case. May Climb in a week or >> > two and Change to a Rocket with a new 120* sector. >> > >> > But you asked Josh. Yep I have had it. >> > >> > Steve Barnes >> > General Manager >> > PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> > Behalf Of Josh Luthman >> > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:53 AM >> > To: WISPA General List >> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Ubnt_users] Ubiquity Rocket M2 with Tranzeo CPE >> > >> >>Might have to start drinking the ubiquity koolaid. I've just not had >> >>good luck with the ones I've tried out here. >> > >> > Have you had any situation where a Tranzeo worked at a customer site and >> > Ubiquiti didn't? >> > >> > I replaced my Tranzeo stuff with Mikrotik way back before Ubiquiti had >> > their stuff. I doubt I will ever use a Tranzeo radio again. >> > >> > Josh Luthman >> > Office: 937-552-2340 >> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >> > 1100 Wayne St >> > Suite 1337 >> > Troy, OH 45373 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) >> > <o...@odessaoffice.com> wrote: >> >> I can't help with the Ubiquity issue, but your CPE situation is the >> >> same as ours. I know Mikrotik works well with them. >> >> >> >> Once you get something working well you'll love the new AP's! >> >> >> >> I do wish Tranzeo would fix the danged lockup issues on the cpe's >> >> though. >> >> Some people never have trouble, others do weekly. ug >> >> >> >> Might have to start drinking the ubiquity koolaid. I've just not had >> >> good luck with the ones I've tried out here. >> >> marlon >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> >> >> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_us...@wispa.org> >> >> Cc: <wireless@wispa.org>; <ubnt_us...@wispa.org> >> >> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 4:06 PM >> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Ubnt_users] Ubiquity Rocket M2 with Tranzeo CPE >> >> >> >> >> >>> Did you install the RF Armor shield kits? They are an incredible >> >>> help at defeating noise. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 14:47, Jay DeBoer <jdeb...@summitdigital.us> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I am in process of converting a tower from Tranzeo AP's to Ubquity >> >>>> Rocket M2's. I have the M2's hung and pointed. I can get the >> >>>> clients to connect but I seem to be getting half throughput at best. >> >>>> >> >>>> I have the Airmax disabled on the M2's and the Clients have been >> >>>> running in 802.11b mode previously. >> >>>> >> >>>> The clients are a mix of Tranzeo CPQ and SL2 radios. Signal levels >> >>>> appear to be a bout the same if not a little better. My noise floor >> >>>> has seem to come up from around -100 to -95/90ish. >> >>>> >> >>>> At this point I'm a little lost / too frustrated to think straight. >> >>>> Any suggestions would be appreciated. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you. >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Jay DeBoer >> >>>> >> >>>> Chief Engineer >> >>>> Summit Digital Holdings, Inc. >> >>>> 100 N Roland St, Suite B >> >>>> McBain, MI 49657 >> >>>> >> >>>> Office: 231-825-2500 >> >>>> Direct: 231-908-0033 >> >>>> Fax: 231-908-0039 >> >>>> jdeb...@summitdigital.us >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >>>> ubnt_us...@wispa.org >> >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >>> Wireless@wispa.org >> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> Wireless@wispa.org >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> > Wireless@wispa.org >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> > Wireless@wispa.org >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
