But VoIP IS data....

LEA is just after the data.  They don't care who gives it to them when they 
are trying to track down a bad guy.

You remember the conversations we had with the FBI.  Without a standard in 
place you (the operator of the network) have to do everything you reasonably 
can to comply with their requests.

If you are a VoIP provider but the VoIP doesn't ride your network you can't 
track it.  Just like you couldn't track a ptp file sharing application *IF* 
neither end of the transaction rides your network.

But, *IF* either end of the transaction rides your network you can and will 
have to intercept the conversation and send a copy to LEA.

Why is VoIP any different?  It's just a voice conversation instead of a 
kiddie porn video.  Both have an audio component, both are data at the 
network level.

I'm not saying you are wrong here.  But if I were the LEA I'd not care, I 
just need the data.

marlon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.C. Utter" <[email protected]>
To: "Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Caleaquestions] [WISPA] VoIP CALEA Question


>I agree with your first sentence, Marlon, but your second comment seems 
>unclear because everyone hands off traffic.
>
> The main difference between 3rd party and in-house VoIP is that you have a 
> different set of rules to follow for CALEA compliance specifically for 
> voice service providers that includes the requirement to provide call 
> records to the LEA (called number, start call, end call, call duration, 
> etc.). There are other differences, but this is the main difference. The 
> WISPA CALEA Standard does not apply to VoIP intercepts when VoIP is hosted 
> in-house. The IPNA standard is specifically for Network Access providers 
> (the "NA" in IPNA) and not for Voice Service Providers.
>
> We should have a standard for wireless VoIP providers, because a lot of 
> WISPs offer VoIP today compared to the time when we started writing the 
> first WISPA CALEA standard.
>
> jc
>
>
> On 3/1/2012 11:20 AM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) wrote:
>> You can only record what hits your network.
>>
>> If it's handed off to someone else they'll have to record it.
>>
>> marlon
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Matt Hoppes"<[email protected]>
>> To:<[email protected]>; "WISPA General List"<[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 6:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP CALEA Question
>>
>>
>>> I'm obviously not asking the question properly.
>>>
>>> I know how to do a CALEA capture for regular IP traffic.  My question is
>>> related to VoIP traffic in particular.
>>>
>>> (e.g. Yes, if a customer has Vonage I obviously can't record the call...
>>> but I can capture the packets).
>>>
>>> However, my understanding was always that if you provided VoIP from your
>>> network you had to be able to record both legs of the call so that the
>>> LEA can determine, for example, which side of the call a noise was heard
>>> on.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hoppes
>>> Director of Information Technology
>>> Indigo Wireless
>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>
>>> On 3/1/12 9:38 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>>>> Do a google search on "Mikrotik CALEA", take a look at  The Mikrotik
>>>> WIki as well as Butch's CALEA (MUM 2007) presentation.
>>>> This will give you an excellent idea on how to accomplish what you are
>>>> asking for .
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>> Snappy Internet&    Telecom
>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>>> Miami, Fl 33155
>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>> Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/1/2012 7:20 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>> We are considering doing some limited VoIP offerings to supplement our
>>>>> GSM offerings in certain situations.
>>>>>
>>>>> A question that just arose, and I don't know the answer to is:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Understanding that an interconnected VoIP carrier must be CALEA
>>>>> compliant and be able to record calls.
>>>>>
>>>>> ** How does this situation work if the audio stream does not pass
>>>>> through your soft-switch? (e.g. end user makes a call, my soft switch
>>>>> sets up the call between end-user and Level3, and then a re-invite
>>>>> happens which sends the audio from the end-user direct to the Level3
>>>>> switch)
>>>>>
>>>>> How am I suppose to be able to record that call?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> _______________________________________________
>> Caleaquestions mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/caleaquestions
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to