Yes it would be. Sorry for typos. On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>wrote:
> That would be 493 and 1100 model numbers... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ben West <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you all for the recommendations. I will be passing them along to >> my friend. >> >> This is the basic take-away that I've gleaned from your responses: >> >> To manage ~50Mbit/s uplink effectively: Mikrotik RB450G >> >> To manage ~75-100Mbit/s uplink effectively: Mikrotik RB439G >> >> For an uplink much faster than 100Mbit/s: Mikrotik RB110AH >> >> I am also telling him he should be able to continue using WinBox to >> manage his new router, and that he also should be able to copy/paste >> relevant bits of his current setup on the RB750GS to whatever new MT >> product. >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Scott Lambert <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:44:45AM -0500, Ben West wrote: >>> > Hi All >>> > >>> > Could someone recommend a Mikrotik product, ideally one of Router >>> > Boards w/ enclosure, that would be effective for performing bandwidth >>> > shaping of ~3 dozen clients sharing a single uplink with 100Mbit/s >>> > download speed? I.e., what product are you using for this purpose >>> > now? >>> > >>> > Ideally, the bandwidth shaping could enforce multiple profiles, e.g. >>> > some clients get 10Mbit/s down, some get 3Mbit/s down. There would >>> > be comparable shaping applied on clients' upload speeds, but the >>> > correctly shaped download speeds are a higher priority. Also, it is >>> > possible this uplink may be upgraded 200 or even 300Mbit/s, so it >>> > would be cool if the MT product (which I presume would have 1Gbit/s >>> > integrated LAN) could also handle an uplink of that speed too. >>> >>> If you are currently doing 100Mbps and expect to do more in the >>> near future, I would probably go straight to the $500 RB1100AHx2. >>> >>> If you think it will be a while before you actually fill the 100Mbps >>> pipe, it may be worthwile buying a $100 RB450G or $250 RB493G and >>> hoping the prices of the RB1xxx devices come down. >>> >>> The RB4xxG series may be able to handle the 100Mbps requirements >>> depending on how you setup your queue trees. But in my environment, >>> the RB493G CPU loading gets too high for comfort when we push in >>> the neighborhood of 75Mbps. We only use 50 - 60 MB of RAM. >>> >>> We have address-list based mangle rules feeding PCQ queue trees for >>> rate limiting individual customers. Fewer than 150 IPs in the >>> address-lists. >>> >>> -- >>> Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix >>> SysAdmin >>> [email protected] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ben West >> http://gowasabi.net >> [email protected] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- Ben West http://gowasabi.net [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
