we could also then put high gain receive antennas (and maybe even apms???) at the tower
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > what if we Tx to the CPE in 3.65Ghz with 25Mhz channels then we only > have to register the tower location, then Tx to the tower with 900Mhz, > 2.4Ghz or 5.xGhz??? > > -sean > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: >> I think that there are some common bands that would allow a wide market, 2.4 >> ghz, 3.x ghz and 5.x ghz are fairly widespread, the challenge is to SCALE as >> you say... that is something that UBNT achieved using wifi chipsets. The >> way I see its is that you might need to think out of the box to achieve >> multicarrier aggregation WITH either cheap wifi chipsets ore something >> similar >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> g...@aeronetpr.com >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> 787.273.4143 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Patrick Leary >> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:04 PM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP manufacturers! >> >> That'd be one sexy product Gino. Two obvious challenges: >> >> 1. Lack of international unity in spectrum used for BWA, which hurts the >> ability to get to commodity pricing. Of course, this is already being done >> with 802.11n though, which supports both 2.4 GHz (802.11g compatible) and 5 >> GHz. >> >> 2. The cellular guys benefit from S C A L E. Last I heard there were over 1B >> cell phones in use today. That's some scale man and enables cost to drive W >> A Y down. >> >> Now you are seeing SDR radios (I know, that's redundant, but sounds funky if >> I leave out "radio") hitting the market for our space, the latest being our >> 3.65 COMPACT. This at least enables some strong investment protection. I >> remember Vanu Bose championing them way back in to 2002, but it takes time >> and mass before things get to market. We can only do it because the costs of >> FPGAs have gone way down. Not low enough to use in CPE, but low enough to go >> into base stations. >> >> It's good though for you guys to constantly apply pressure. >> >> Patrick Leary >> Alvarion >> m: 727.501.3735 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> >> To: a...@afmug.com, "WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)" >> <wireless@wispa.org> >> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 1:14:39 PM >> Subject: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP manufacturers! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I would like to see a Multiband Mimo PMP System similar to what is being >> developed in the LTE-Advanced RF protocol, where a BaseStation can use >> various spectrum bands to talk to CPEs… >> >> >> >> Imaging having an AP with multiple RF Sections using 2.4,3.x,5.x and >> aggregate all bands in a single Layer 1 medium to the CPE…also could split >> the downlink/uplink in various bands…youll need sync, plus some special >> sauce to organize Spectrum availability and Identify external interference.. >> but all that could be achieve out of the AP in a Cloud controller… >> >> >> >> So whos the taker? >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> >> g...@aeronetpr.com >> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> >> 787.273.4143 >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp >> Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >> viruses(100). >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp >> Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >> viruses(42). >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp >> Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >> viruses(42). >> ************************************************************************************ >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
