> approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is > excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even > Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100? _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
