>> > approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is >> > excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even >> > Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV. >> >>Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100? > > I'm referring to the 900 MHz version with a 4 Mbps one-way burst > rate. That won't pass the 4/1 test.
Ok, makes sense. Wireless utility meter readers trashed most of 900 spectrum for us. _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
