I /have /seen similar things on Canopy 900.

1. I work with a lot of 900 APs. Test the radios that are down. Leave
   them running connected to the tower as an SM from a couple miles for
   a couple days. I bet they are just fine. But testing an AP as an SM
   is not a 100% guaranteed test (had one test fine then burn up after
   use on the tower as an AP for 90 minutes).
2. My gut says you are looking in the wrong spot. You need to be
   monitoring the amps being drawn by the radio. I think it is your
   CMM/CTM (assuming you are using one). Switch it to a different port.
   If not, swap the power supply.
3. Your radio is running too hot. -45 is not a good thing on 900! Set
   the AP to bring everyone down to (say) -65. You could be desensing
   the receiver. We have people connecting happily in the -80s.
4. The 2.4 is not the issue. We have some located 0 ft vertically
   offset and horizontally within 12" of 900 radios (plural) with them
   all on omnis. 4 feet of vertical separation is ample.


On 6/13/2013 11:41 AM, David Hannum wrote:
The S/N's on the radios are not really close. The second two that went bad came from a different shipment from the first batch. No visible signs of vandalism. Tower has locked cage around ladder. I can't imagine vandalism, however, you never rule out anything you can prove is out.
Dave


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Coenraad Loubser <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Extreme bad luck - or perhaps not - are all the radios perhaps
    from a faulty batch? Vandalism - Is there any sort of access
    control or surveillance at the site? The first thoughts that
    spring to mind.



    On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:40 PM, David Hannum <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Never tried that before.  We always use LPU's on the CAT-5 but
        I've never put one on the antenna lead.  What kind of line
loss does it cause? I don't see that in the Tech Specs. Also, does it come with a male antenna connector side?
        Dave Hannum


        On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Kurt Fankhauser
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Can you possibly put a polyphaser on the 9000APC? I use these:

            
http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=531462&eventPage=1

            Kurt Fankhauser

            Wavelinc Communications

            P.O. Box 126

            Bucyrus, OH 44820

            http://www.wavelinc.com

            tel. 419-562-6405 <tel:419-562-6405>

            fax. 419-617-0110 <tel:419-617-0110>

            *From:*[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            [mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *David
            Hannum
            *Sent:* Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:11 AM
            *To:* WISPA General List
            *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Strange problem with Canopy 9000APC

            The first radio went bad on the first antenna.  The second
and third radios have gone bad on the second antenna. We'll probably swap the antenna again this afternoon on
            this one.

            Dave Hannum

            New Era Broadband

            On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jason Bailey
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            That's why I said antenna. It happened frequently after
            changing the antenna.

            --- On *Thu, 6/13/13, David Hannum /<[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>/* wrote:


            From: David Hannum <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>


            Subject: Re: [WISPA] Strange problem with Canopy 9000APC

            To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>

            Date: Thursday, June 13, 2013, 10:01 AM

            Moisture is not an issue.  Good drip loops on both the
            antenna cable and CAT-5 Cables.  We actually sealed the
            entry of the radio with mastic to be sure.  The first
            radio lasted about 10 months. When it went, we first
            swapped antennas, thinking maybe a lightning strike
            damaged it (we've had the same effect on signal from bad
            antenna). That did nothing to help, so we next swapped the
            radio. Signal back. That lasted about four weeks. Swapped
            radio again, and signal back. Lasted about 12 hours this time.

            No visible damage to any of the radios.  No moisture found
            inside.  We don't have capability to test in-house. Will
            send to SWG or Wireless Units to have them take a look.

            Dave Hannum

            New Era Broadband

            On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Fred Goldstein
            <[email protected]
            <http://mc/[email protected]>> wrote:

            On 6/13/2013 7:43 AM, David Hannum wrote:
            > We're having an issue with a 9000APC that is very
            strange.  Here is the
            > situation.  We have a remote water tank (stand pipe 75'
            high) that has a
            > few homes around it.  So, we have a 9000APC and a
            connectorized 2450AP
            > on the tower, both on Omni's.  The antennas are on a
            stand almost
            > exactly 4' apart.  There are six subs on the 900MHz
            radio.  About a
            > month ago, I had an issue where (after about 9 months)
            the signal to all
            > of the customers just faded out, to the point that only
            two subs were
            > still good.  I swapped the antenna and that did not
            help.  I swapped the
            > radio, and that fixed the problem.  Trouble is, it only
            lasted about
            > three weeks, and the same thing happened again.  I
            swapped the radio
            > again yesterday, and today, I'm back in the same boat.
             The radio in the
            > AP keeps going out.  I had the climbers check the
            grounding, and we
            > actually ran a dedicated ground yesterday off the water
            tank.  My knee
            > jerk feeling today is that maybe the radios are too
            close together, and
            > the 2450 is burning up the 900.  Could this be the case?
             Any ideas?
            > Here is an example of what happens.  Customers that run
            signals -47 to
            > -57 become -70 to -75 and those who's signals were -70
            and up fall clear
            > off.  Swap the radio, and everything goes back to
            normal.  This is now
            > three radios that have gone, each lasting a much shorter
            time than the
            > previous.  (this one did not make it 24 hours).
            > I can't completely rule out lightning - the tower is in
            a very wooded
            > area.  But usually you burn up the NIC in that case -
            not weaken the radio.
            > Thoughts?

            Interesting mystery!  Clearly you don't want to blow more
            radios this way.

            Any more clues about what may have happened right before
            the failures?
            I'm wondering about weather events.  Did it fail after a
            rain storm?
            Water coming in to the radio or corroding the antenna
            connectors might
            result.  And if the antenna's connector is flaky,
            re-attaching it to a
            new radio might be a temporary fix, but reattaching it to
            an old radio
            might "fix" it too (temporariy).  Have you examined the
            broken radios in
            the shop?

            --
              Fred R. Goldstein          fred "at" interisle.net
            <http://interisle.net>
              Interisle Consulting Group
            +1 617 795 2701 <tel:%2B1%20617%20795%202701>

            _______________________________________________
            Wireless mailing list
            [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
            http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

            -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

            _______________________________________________
            Wireless mailing list
            [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
            http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


            _______________________________________________
            Wireless mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


            _______________________________________________
            Wireless mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



        _______________________________________________
        Wireless mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



    _______________________________________________
    Wireless mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to