Josh - $21.95 residential and $29.95 business.

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com>wrote:

>  On 7/28/2013 2:20 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>
> So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee?  You stated
> that I cannot charge more than I pass along but if I pass along nothing
> until I am at the 10K mark then am I not supposed to bill it until that
> point?
>
>
> Carlos has good advice -- consult a lawyer.  (I'm not a lawyer but I play
> an engineer on TV.)  I just checked with one who could not render actual
> "advice".  Rather, he explained, "This is one of the mysteries of USF."
>
> The FCC forgot about this case when they did the rules.  So the usual
> practice seems to be to collect the fees.  You might after all be passing
> them along to your wholesale provider, who is charging USF to you.  But if
> you do go over the $10k limit, then you could owe retroactively, and in
> that case you want the money in the bank!  So unless they've clarified this
> in the instructions on the Form 499s (be warned; they do that sometimes,
> and you don't know the rule until you read the new fine print), you can
> pass along the fee you would be collecting under safe harbor, and apply it
> to the USF charges you're being hit with.
>
> I don't think these crazy fees are a reason to avoid voice services, but
> they are a pain to administer.  The FCC is terrible about writing clear
> rules.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com>wrote:
>
>>  On 7/28/2013 12:46 AM, Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> From what I read it seems like you can collect whatever you want directly
>> from your customers but it may be considered as income and taxed as such.
>> So you can't really pass it on as a direct fee and bypass your income tax
>> liability for it.
>>
>>
>>  No.  Federal billing rules say that you cannot collect more on your
>> retail bill for FUSF than you pass along.  No markups allowed.  Most of the
>> other charges can also be passed along one for one, but state rules could
>> vary.
>>
>> But the rate is not exactly what you think.  The Federal USF rate is
>> calculated as a percentage, changed quarterly (it has gone over 17%), of
>> your interstate telecommunications service billing.  If you are providing
>> local telephone service, that line item is not subject to USF as it is
>> intrastate, not intersate.  Internet access is not subject to USF as it is
>> information service, not telecommunications service.  The tax was meant to
>> apply to long distance calls, which were a lot of money back in the day.
>>
>> If you are (as is the norm nowadays) providing a service that does not
>> charge explicitly for interstate long distance, then you have two options.
>> There is a "safe harbor" of 64.9%, wherein that percentage of the total
>> phone package is deemed interstate.  So if you sold it for $10/month, the
>> tax would be applied to $6.49 of it.  This number was computed back when
>> VoIP services were primarily used as cheap dial-around long distance, not
>> as primary lines, so the "PIU" (percentage interstate use -- this number
>> comes up a LOT in telecom billing) was high.
>>
>> You can also compute what percentage of your calls are actually
>> interstate, and pay USF on that percentage of the bill.  This involves
>> filling out the Form 499-Q's correctly, but it is the norm nowadays.
>>
>> Bear in mind that there is a "de minimis" rule.  If you would owe less
>> than $10k/year, then you only file Form 499-A (annual, vs. quarterly), and
>> don't pay anything.  BUT you then are treated as a retail customer of your
>> wholesale provider(s), and *they* collect USF on what they bill you.  If
>> you are no de minimis, and do actually pay USF, then you tell that to your
>> providers, who have to verify it against FCC records, and then they don't
>> charge you USF.  It's sort of like a retailer's exemption on sales tax;
>> it's only collected once.  Note that this whole system is on the docket at
>> the FCC and they're still thinking about how to revise it, but don't seem
>> to have a consensus, so they're just putting it off.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com>wrote:
>>
>>> That looks about right, it varies by state/locality of course. We
>>> collect Federal USF, State use tax, state and county E911. The USF you get
>>> to pocket until your required contributions are $10k/year - under that you
>>> are considered "de minimus" and just have to file the annual form.
>>>
>>>  When we set up our billing the Telecom Relay Fund passed under our
>>> radar so now we're just paying for that out of pocket. I'm not sure if you
>>> are allowed to collect that specifically from your customers as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>    I am attempting to figure out all of the taxes for VoiP and the
>>>> main thing that has me confused is the Universal Service Fund.  It seems
>>>> that my state (Utah) has a USF of 0.45% 
>>>> http://www.psc.state.ut.us/utilities/telecom/documents/Rule%20746-360%20amendment.rtf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Then it also seems like the Feds want 15.1%??  That is huge!
>>>> http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/contribution-factor-quarterly-filings-universal-service-fund-usf-management-support
>>>>
>>>>  Then there is sales and use tax of
>>>> *State Sales & Use -* 4.7%
>>>>  *Municipality Sales & Use - *varies - see
>>>> http://tax.utah.gov/salestax/rate/13q3combined.pdf
>>>>
>>>>  Then we have E911:
>>>>
>>>> *E911 State -* .08
>>>> *E911 County -* .61
>>>>  *Poison Control -* .07
>>>> *-------------------------------*
>>>>  *Total for E911 -* .76
>>>>
>>>>  Then, since October 2011 we are also liable for the *Telecommunications
>>>> Relay Fund* - .06
>>>>  http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.pdf
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing 
>> listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>>   --
>>  Fred R. Goldstein              fred "at" interisle.net
>>  Interisle Consulting Group
>>  +1 617 795 2701
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing 
> listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> --
>  Fred R. Goldstein              fred "at" interisle.net
>  Interisle Consulting Group
>  +1 617 795 2701
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to