I would go licensed backhauls and save all the unlicensed spectrum for pmp.
That way you have a bunch of different tools to use for the last mile. Start with a couple backhauls each year and work your way out...you'll be glad you did. Also 5.4ghz is very useful because the noise floor is almost always -95 (in our area at least) the lower noise floor makes it just as useful as 5.8 where the noise is -80 Sean On Wednesday, July 31, 2013, Daniel Mullen wrote: > It may come to that, but all of our back haul links are 5 GHz and it was > always intended to be kept 'clean' for this purpose. If we could count on > using the 3.65 GHz for backhaul it would mean switching the links on ~20 > towers but help us get out of the 2.4 GHz mess. > > Daniel > > At 00:43 01.08.2013, you wrote: > > Content-Language: en-US > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > ** ** boundary="_000_CE1F0B6B1B2E1gavaeronetprcom_" > > Why don't you use PMP450 in 5ghz? > > > > Gino A. Villarini > President > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > www.aeronetpr.com > @aeronetpr > > > > From: Daniel Mullen <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> > Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:22 PM > To: WISPA General List <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site > > If this helps: > > We are in Canada - spectrum license time: one week. Effort: one page > letter. > > There are three 900 MHz Canopy sectors and an omni serving at least 24 > customers who are now on 2.4 GHz Canopy. > > Currently the backhaul is on 5 GHz but this will need to change to support > a ~300 Mbps link. > > The site is on a hill with a 96' tower overlooking the coast, with all of > the 30 or so 2.4 GHz customers being inside of 1000 yards, and perhaps a > few more up to 2000 yards away. > > My plan was to put up two Titanium base stations, each with a 90° antenna > of unknown source as of yet, and to put up to 24 customers on each sector > to offer an upgrade to either 5 Mbps or 10 Mbps connections. These are > existing customers, so it would be free radio rental and free installation > in return for 24 month contracts. > > I would be more than willing to deploy something like the PMP450 or Runcom > LTE stuff, but we need to do this in the next couple of weeks. > > Daniel > > > At 18:20 31.07.2013, you wrote: > > Use NSM365 with a dish on all but the shortest links. > > Keep distances short, 4 miles or less. > > AMQ above 80% > > TX CCQ above 75% > > RX level or -70 or better > > AMQ, TX CCQ, & RX level must *ALL* be at or above those values. > > Keep SM counts below 45 or so. > > Use KP Performance antennas or Ubiquiti antennas with RF Armor shields. > > Once the above is done, start saving money for the upcoming 3.65 PMP450 > (don't hold your breath though) and replace the Ubiquiti gear when it > becomes available. > > > > On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:01 AM, < [email protected]<javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> > < [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> wrote: > > We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week to take existing customers > off of an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system. > > Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz gear from Ubnt and could > recommend which model of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid a steep > 'learning curve' since we have never deployed anything from Ubiquiti until > now. > > Suggestions as to the best prices are most welcome too! > > Thanks, > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
