It's cut down in confusion. Oh yeah. 5 meg is x in town a but y in town b.
And we don't do the upto game. So if you want 5 and can only get 3 we won't install you unless you'll take 3. We don't charge for packages folks can't get. Likewise this keeps our network happy since most links are pretty clean. On Dec 30, 2013, at 21:48, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is a good idea > > Sent from my waaaaaaaay too expensive android mobile vzw 4gish device..... > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> > To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > Cc: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > Subject: [WISPA] Internet Packages regarding geography > Date: Mon, Dec 30, 2013 9:34 PM > > > What we have done is offer the same packages across the board. If you can't > get at least the package you want we don't install you. > > On Dec 30, 2013, at 21:11, "heith petersen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We are getting to the point in a lot of our markets that we need to offer >> different speed packages. Issue being some markets, being 900 or slightly >> sub-par infrastructure, we wouldn’t be able to promote these packages across >> the board. Was curious if others are offering packages to different areas >> that would not be possible in some? And if so, do you get any backlash from >> those who cannot get those packages? Is it appropriate to offer extended >> packages to users on one tower when another tower down the road wouldn’t be >> capable of these packages? Its bad but we just offer a residential rate, no >> matter if that customer can get 1 meg down via Canopy 900 or close to 10 meg >> on a UBNT SM. I have caught a little heat in an area where we fired up 900 >> about 4 years ago to a market that had only satellite. Then we hooked up a >> tower in a small town 4 miles away with UBNT M2 and news spread like wild >> fire. We went from 40 900 subs to about a dozen, and a pile of radios I >> don’t want to deploy again. Shame on me for not offering the extended >> packages at that time for those wanting more bandwidth. >> >> I also have the area outside my home town that Century Link offers what they >> claim is 12 meg service, but it never gets close. I am constantly adding >> more sectors in these areas, Im getting to the point where I am adding UBNT >> to offload Canopy, then adding more UBNT to offload the UBNT that was >> offloading the Canopy, it gets to be a vicious circle. I am already $20 per >> month more than CL, not sure if a lot of customers would stay if I were to >> charge them more for what they are getting now. Once again shame on me. The >> bosses think the prices should be the same across the board, but technically >> performances cannot be matched across the board, plus Im running ragged >> satisfying existing customers when I should be looking at new areas, and >> start the vicious circle all over again LOL. >> >> thanks >> heith >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
