When you are saying TI is 'not worth its salt', are you saying the sectors or the TI radios? We have a couple dozen TI sectors using non-TI radios with great results. Installed a NanoBeam M5 to one last Friday with 25/18Mbps at 1.5 miles and on last Saturday install an RDM5 dish to same TI sector with standard M5 rocket at 5.5 miles for 20/18 on the edge of the 120 degrees and through row of trees. Noise levels. Then two weeks ago we had 38/25 on one at 5 miles with NanoBridge.
TI Radios have reported issues and have not used them at all yet... waiting for better reports. Just wanted to clear up discussion. I use RFArmour also, but the TI sectors have less wind load and foot print for our mini-towers. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Mark Spring <[email protected]> wrote: > I had to relocate some TI Sectors that I installed because of inter AP > interference. While I didn't get a chance to haul rf armor up and compare > the two, so perhaps it was just planned poorly from the start. The > overwhelming response I see online is that the titanium gear isn't worth > it's salt, so when we saw this in the field we just went back to the > trusted gear. They are making 5ghz rf armor for the titanium sectors. > > The nanobeam does seem to be a recent piece of innovation that has turned > out well...it hasn't baked for a long time though, hoping it proves out > because I really like what I see at this point. > > Mark Spring > Systems Analyst > > New Knoxville Telephone Company > 301 W. South St. > New Knoxville, OH 45871 > 419.753.5000 > > This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary > information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any > unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or > dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not > transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the > expressed written permission of NKTelco. > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Clay Stewart < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Let me clarify, regular M2 rockets on TI sectors. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Spring <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Clay, >>> >>> We put up some of the TI rockets with the same idea in mind, maybe >>> they've gotten better but I got sick of sending guys out to change them >>> out. Even after the recall it seems that they create more work, sticking >>> with the old school sectors and rockets for now(with shielding). Just my >>> two cents on a slightly unrelated topic. >>> >>> Was KP looking at dual frequency antennas like this recently? Seems to >>> me that I saw something similar floating around the boards.. >>> >>> Mark Spring >>> Systems Analyst >>> >>> New Knoxville Telephone Company >>> 301 W. South St. >>> New Knoxville, OH 45871 >>> 419.753.5000 >>> >>> This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary >>> information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any >>> unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or >>> dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not >>> transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the >>> expressed written permission of NKTelco. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Mike Hammett >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> There are a few companies that make dual band sectors, IT Elite being >>>> one of them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Clay Stewart" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected], "WISPA General List" < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> *Sent: *Monday, March 17, 2014 8:24:44 AM >>>> >>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached >>>> >>>> Wish I had thought of looking into a larger antenna holding box... just >>>> leased a tower which will have 6 of the UBNT TI sectors (2.4/5.8)... could >>>> have saved me about $500 a month in lease fees. I wonder if there is >>>> already a box that could hold a TI 2.4 and TI 5.8? I want to use TIs for >>>> the shielding and performance. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, [email protected] < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've thought about doing this in case of equipment failure. Have one >>>>> radio powered off and the other active. If the active >>>>> should die or have issues, I can remotely switch on the powered off >>>>> radio and power down the active radio. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stuart Pierce <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like the top left rocket isn't even powered up. >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>>>>> From: Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >>>>>> Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]> >>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:19:30 +0000 >>>>>> >>>>>> >I think one of the many local wisps popping here are getting very >>>>>> "creative" >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Anyone can ID this sector? Im thinking its a Mobile Carrier antenna >>>>>> that they are reusing… but what band? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Gino A. Villarini >>>>>> >President >>>>>> >Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>>>>> >www.aeronetpr.com >>>>>> >@aeronetpr >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> SCS >>>> Clay Stewart >>>> CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >>>> DBA Stewart Computer Services >>>> 434.263.6363 O >>>> 434.942.6510 C >>>> [email protected] >>>> “We Keep You Up and Running” >>>> Wireless Broadband >>>> Programming >>>> Network Services >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wireless mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wireless mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> -- >> SCS >> Clay Stewart >> CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >> DBA Stewart Computer Services >> 434.263.6363 O >> 434.942.6510 C >> [email protected] >> “We Keep You Up and Running” >> Wireless Broadband >> Programming >> Network Services >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- -- SCS Clay Stewart CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., DBA Stewart Computer Services 434.263.6363 O 434.942.6510 C [email protected] “We Keep You Up and Running” Wireless Broadband Programming Network Services
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
