I am already using the sector-XL 2.4/5dualband 2xMIMO antennas. It seems like the only difference is the place to hold the radios inside it.
Allen Pooley Ranch Wireless Sent from my Ranch Phone On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Pedro Ramirez <[email protected]> wrote: > Tomorrow we receive our 1st shipment of the following antenna: > > http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/Multi-Band-Antennas//PRO-SECTOR-XL-245dual-band2xdual-HV.html > > designed specifically to fit 2 Rockets in 2.4 & 5GHz inside. > > I will post pictures as soon as I can. > > Pedro > Itelite Antennas, Inc > > On 17-Mar-14 6:30 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: >> Also... to remain non-bias... have many Itelite ants too with Rockets. They >> are great for very low profile, esthetically placement of rockets, >> especially the 55 degree square box models. >> >> Would be very interested in a box to accept an RM2 and RM5. I talked to an >> ex-installer today who now works for one of the big cells as tower equipment >> engineer... he says almost all of the LTE sectors are dual band... show me a >> phone picture which looked very much like the box that started this thread. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Clay Stewart >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> When you are saying TI is 'not worth its salt', are you saying the sectors >>> or the TI radios? We have a couple dozen TI sectors using non-TI radios >>> with great results. Installed a NanoBeam M5 to one last Friday with >>> 25/18Mbps at 1.5 miles and on last Saturday install an RDM5 dish to same TI >>> sector with standard M5 rocket at 5.5 miles for 20/18 on the edge of the >>> 120 degrees and through row of trees. Noise levels. Then two weeks ago we >>> had 38/25 on one at 5 miles with NanoBridge. >>> >>> TI Radios have reported issues and have not used them at all yet... waiting >>> for better reports. Just wanted to clear up discussion. I use RFArmour >>> also, but the TI sectors have less wind load and foot print for our >>> mini-towers. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Mark Spring <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I had to relocate some TI Sectors that I installed because of inter AP >>>> interference. While I didn't get a chance to haul rf armor up and compare >>>> the two, so perhaps it was just planned poorly from the start. The >>>> overwhelming response I see online is that the titanium gear isn't worth >>>> it's salt, so when we saw this in the field we just went back to the >>>> trusted gear. They are making 5ghz rf armor for the titanium sectors. >>>> >>>> The nanobeam does seem to be a recent piece of innovation that has turned >>>> out well...it hasn't baked for a long time though, hoping it proves out >>>> because I really like what I see at this point. >>>> >>>> Mark Spring >>>> Systems Analyst >>>> >>>> New Knoxville Telephone Company >>>> 301 W. South St. >>>> New Knoxville, OH 45871 >>>> 419.753.5000 >>>> >>>> This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary >>>> information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any >>>> unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or >>>> dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not >>>> transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the >>>> expressed written permission of NKTelco. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Clay Stewart >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Let me clarify, regular M2 rockets on TI sectors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Spring <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Clay, >>>>>> >>>>>> We put up some of the TI rockets with the same idea in mind, maybe >>>>>> they've gotten better but I got sick of sending guys out to change them >>>>>> out. Even after the recall it seems that they create more work, sticking >>>>>> with the old school sectors and rockets for now(with shielding). Just my >>>>>> two cents on a slightly unrelated topic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Was KP looking at dual frequency antennas like this >>>>>> recently? Seems to me that I saw something >>>>>> similar floating around the boards.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Spring >>>>>> Systems Analyst >>>>>> >>>>>> New Knoxville Telephone Company >>>>>> 301 W. South St. >>>>>> New Knoxville, OH 45871 >>>>>> 419.753.5000 >>>>>> >>>>>> This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary >>>>>> information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any >>>>>> unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or >>>>>> dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not >>>>>> transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the >>>>>> expressed written permission of NKTelco. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> There are a few companies that make dual band sectors, IT Elite being >>>>>>> one of them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Clay Stewart" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: [email protected], "WISPA General List" >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 8:24:44 AM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wish I had thought of looking into a larger antenna holding box... just >>>>>>> leased a tower which will have 6 of the UBNT TI sectors (2.4/5.8)... >>>>>>> could have saved me about $500 a month in lease fees. I wonder if there >>>>>>> is already a box that could hold a TI 2.4 >>>>>>> and TI 5.8? I want to use TIs for the >>>>>>> shielding and performance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, [email protected] >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> I've thought about doing this in case of equipment >>>>>>>> failure. Have one radio powered >>>>>>>> off and the other >>>>>>>> active. If the active >>>>>>>> should die or have issues, I can remotely switch on the powered off >>>>>>>> radio and >>>>>>>> power down the active radio. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stuart Pierce <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looks like the top left rocket isn't even powered up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> From: Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> Date:  Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:19:30 +0000 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >I think one of the many local wisps popping here are getting very >>>>>>>>> >"creative" >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >Anyone can ID this sector? Im thinking its a >>>>>>>>> > Mobile Carrier antenna that they >>>>>>>>> >are reusing… but what band? >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >Gino A. Villarini >>>>>>>>> >President >>>>>>>>> >Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>>>>>>>> >www.aeronetpr.com >>>>>>>>> >@aeronetpr >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> SCS   >>>>>>>  Clay Stewart >>>>>>>  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >>>>>>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services  >>>>>>>  434.263.6363 O >>>>>>>  434.942.6510 C >>>>>>>  [email protected] >>>>>>> “We Keep You Up and Running†>>>>>>>       Wireless Broadband >>>>>>>       Programming >>>>>>>      Network Services >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> SCS   >>>>>  Clay Stewart >>>>>  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >>>>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services  >>>>>  434.263.6363 O >>>>>  434.942.6510 C >>>>>  [email protected] >>>>> “We Keep You Up and Running†>>>>>       Wireless Broadband >>>>>       Programming >>>>>      Network Services >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wireless mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> -- >>> SCS   >>>  Clay Stewart >>>  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services  >>>  434.263.6363 O >>>  434.942.6510 C >>>  [email protected] >>> “We Keep You Up and Running†>>>       Wireless Broadband >>>       Programming >>>      Network Services >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> -- >> SCS   >>  Clay Stewart >>  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., >>  DBA Stewart Computer Services  >>  434.263.6363 O >>  434.942.6510 C >>  [email protected] >> “We Keep You Up and Running†>>       Wireless Broadband >>       Programming >>      Network Services >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
