I realized a while ago that I would like to know the characterization of
dual polarity antennas in both polarities.. i.e. On a dual polarity
antenna the Vertical polarity has a horizontal and vertical coverage and
the Horizontal polarity has a horizontal and vertical coverage. Is
this something I can find out or are the numbers for vertical and
horizontal good for both antennas? This is important for us.
Thank you,
Robert Andrews
AvantWireless LLC
On 03/18/2014 01:50 PM, Pedro Ramirez wrote:
> Tomorrow we receive our 1st shipment of the following antenna:
>
> http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/Multi-Band-Antennas//PRO-SECTOR-XL-245dual-band2xdual-HV.html
>
> designed specifically to fit 2 Rockets in 2.4 & 5GHz inside.
>
> I will post pictures as soon as I can.
>
> Pedro
> Itelite Antennas, Inc
>
> On 17-Mar-14 6:30 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>> Also... to remain non-bias... have many Itelite ants too with Rockets.
>> They are great for very low profile, esthetically placement of
>> rockets, especially the 55 degree square box models.
>>
>> Would be very interested in a box to accept an RM2 and RM5. I talked
>> to an ex-installer today who now works for one of the big cells as
>> tower equipment engineer... he says almost all of the LTE sectors are
>> dual band... show me a phone picture which looked very much like the
>> box that started this thread.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Clay Stewart
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> When you are saying TI is 'not worth its salt', are you saying the
>> sectors or the TI radios? We have a couple dozen TI sectors using
>> non-TI radios with great results. Installed a NanoBeam M5 to one
>> last Friday with 25/18Mbps at 1.5 miles and on last Saturday
>> install an RDM5 dish to same TI sector with standard M5 rocket at
>> 5.5 miles for 20/18 on the edge of the 120 degrees and through row
>> of trees. Noise levels. Then two weeks ago we had 38/25 on one at
>> 5 miles with NanoBridge.
>>
>> TI Radios have reported issues and have not used them at all
>> yet... waiting for better reports. Just wanted to clear up
>> discussion. I use RFArmour also, but the TI sectors have less wind
>> load and foot print for our mini-towers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Mark Spring <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> I had to relocate some TI Sectors that I installed because of
>> inter AP interference. While I didn't get a chance to haul rf
>> armor up and compare the two, so perhaps it was just planned
>> poorly from the start. The overwhelming response I see online
>> is that the titanium gear isn't worth it's salt, so when we
>> saw this in the field we just went back to the trusted gear.
>> They are making 5ghz rf armor for the titanium sectors.
>>
>> The nanobeam does seem to be a recent piece of innovation that
>> has turned out well...it hasn't baked for a long time though,
>> hoping it proves out because I really like what I see at this
>> point.
>>
>> Mark Spring
>> Systems Analyst
>>
>> New Knoxville Telephone Company
>> 301 W. South St.
>> New Knoxville, OH 45871
>> 419.753.5000 <tel:419.753.5000>
>>
>> This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and
>> proprietary
>> information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended
>> recipient. Any
>> unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or
>> dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly
>> prohibited. Do not
>> transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party
>> without the
>> expressed written permission of NKTelco.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Clay Stewart
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Let me clarify, regular M2 rockets on TI sectors.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Spring
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Clay,
>>
>> We put up some of the TI rockets with the same idea in
>> mind, maybe they've gotten better but I got sick of
>> sending guys out to change them out. Even after the
>> recall it seems that they create more work, sticking
>> with the old school sectors and rockets for now(with
>> shielding). Just my two cents on a slightly unrelated
>> topic.
>>
>> Was KP looking at dual frequency antennas like this
>> recently? Seems to me that I saw something similar
>> floating around the boards..
>>
>> Mark Spring
>> Systems Analyst
>>
>> New Knoxville Telephone Company
>> 301 W. South St.
>> New Knoxville, OH 45871
>> 419.753.5000 <tel:419.753.5000>
>>
>> This message and the file(s) attached are confidential
>> and proprietary
>> information of NKTelco for the sole use of the
>> intended recipient. Any
>> unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure,
>> copying, use, or
>> dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly
>> prohibited. Do not
>> transmit these documents, in any form, to any third
>> party without the
>> expressed written permission of NKTelco.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Mike Hammett
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> There are a few companies that make dual band
>> sectors, IT Elite being one of them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From: *"Clay Stewart"
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>, "WISPA
>> General List" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *Sent: *Monday, March 17, 2014 8:24:44 AM
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic
>> attached
>>
>> Wish I had thought of looking into a larger
>> antenna holding box... just leased a tower which
>> will have 6 of the UBNT TI sectors (2.4/5.8)...
>> could have saved me about $500 a month in lease
>> fees. I wonder if there is already a box that
>> could hold a TI 2.4 and TI 5.8? I want to use TIs
>> for the shielding and performance.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM,
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> I've thought about doing this in case of
>> equipment failure. Have one radio powered off
>> and the other active. If the active
>> should die or have issues, I can remotely
>> switch on the powered off radio and power down
>> the active radio.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stuart Pierce
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Looks like the top left rocket isn't even
>> powered up.
>>
>> ---------- Original Message
>> ----------------------------------
>> From: Gino Villarini <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Reply-To: WISPA General List
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Date: Â Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:19:30 +0000
>>
>> >I think one of the many local wisps
>> popping here are getting very "creative"
>> >
>> >Anyone can ID this sector? Im thinking
>> its a Mobile Carrier antenna that they are
>> reusing… but what band?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Gino A. Villarini
>> >President
>> >Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> >www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>
>> >@aeronetpr
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net
>> <http://avolve.net>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> SCSÂ Â Â
>> Â Clay Stewart
>> Â CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc.,
>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services Â
>> Â 434.263.6363 <tel:434.263.6363> O
>> Â 434.942.6510 <tel:434.942.6510> C
>> Â [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>Â
>> “We Keep You Up and Running�
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Wireless Broadband
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Programming
>> Â Â Â Â Â Network Services
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> SCSÂ Â Â
>> Â Clay Stewart
>> Â CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc.,
>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services Â
>> Â 434.263.6363 <tel:434.263.6363> O
>> Â 434.942.6510 <tel:434.942.6510> C
>> Â [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>Â
>> “We Keep You Up and Running�
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Wireless Broadband
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Programming
>> Â Â Â Â Â Network Services
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> SCSÂ Â Â
>> Â Clay Stewart
>> Â CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc.,
>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services Â
>> Â 434.263.6363 <tel:434.263.6363> O
>> Â 434.942.6510 <tel:434.942.6510> C
>> Â [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>Â
>> “We Keep You Up and Running�
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Wireless Broadband
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Programming
>> Â Â Â Â Â Network Services
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> SCSÂ Â Â
>> Â Clay Stewart
>> Â CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc.,
>>  DBA Stewart Computer Services Â
>> Â 434.263.6363 O
>> Â 434.942.6510 C
>> Â [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>Â
>> “We Keep You Up and Running�
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Wireless Broadband
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Programming
>> Â Â Â Â Â Network Services
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
