On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:14:24PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > The current way we handle Win32 DLL export of symbols is a bit odd in > my eyes.
I agree ;) > This way you'll simply add WS_SYMBOL_IMEXPORT to the header file to > im/export a symbol, e.g.: > > WS_SYMBOL_IMEXPORT int eth_stdio_open (... > Any objections against this (in my eyes cleaner) solution? Sounds good to me. Would we export all symbols or still only certain ones? > P.S: A better name than WS_SYMBOL_IMEXPORT would be nice, any ideas? > Or is it ok? What does the IM stand for? Steve _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
