On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Any objections against this (in my eyes cleaner) solution?
Somebody asked about this in 2004:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06091.html
but I'm not sure why, given the answer:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06093.html
that wasn't done.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
