MIB-RFC1213 is already in the default smi_modules file... I am aware that asking libSMI to reload a MIB already loaded (even if renamed) causes a crash (I see oids.c:572 in the stack but that's a debugger issue I guess). But I do not know a simple solution to avoid reloading a MIB that is already loaded, I've open a bug with the LibSMI guys.
I have an item in http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SNMP about the issue... This weekend I'll try to close as many of the critical Items in that list. Luis On 11/8/07, Andrew Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > > Gerald Combs schrieb: > > > >>It's been a while since 0.99.6 was released (Holy crap! July 5!), so it > >>would > >>probably be a good idea to push 0.99.7 out the door. I'd like to make a > >>prerelease on the 19th or 20th, with a final release a week later. > >> > > > > I had the same idea recently. > > > > Things that probably need a fix before: > > > > - buildbot is unhappy (make it happy again somehow) > > - SNMP changes finished? > > I build HEAD yesterday on Windows (MSVC2005). > > If I include RFC1213-MIB, required to import various Microsoft MIBs, it > segfaults in oids.c at line 574. > > If I don't include RFC1213-MIB it generates an error about the MIB being > missing, but at least it runs. > > If I run in under the MSVC debugger some of the time it works with > RFC1213-MIB present, some time it doesn't. > > I've run smilint against all the M$ MIBs and fixed all the "errors", > event the cosmetic ones, and it still segfaults. > > > -- > There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. > -- Dr. Who > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
