On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Oct 7, 2016, at 4:03 PM, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/7/16 7:45 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> >>> Hey all, recently upgrade my mac to Sierra and tried to revive my
> >>> wireshark build environment. I got it compiling (out-of-tree cmake)
> >>> and most of the tools (tshark) etc seem to work, but:
> >>>
> >>> $ ./run/wireshark
> >>> Listening on en0
> >>> 155 packets seen, 155 packets counted after pcap_dispatch returns
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> No UI ever opens. I have Qt5 installed, and I checked my
> >>> CmakeCache.txt and it is detected and building the UI module
> >>> (BUILD_wireshark:BOOL=ON). The other weird part is:
> >>>
> >>> $ ./run/wireshark -h
> >>> Usage: Wireshark [ -mn ] [ -i interface ] [ -t timeout] [expression]
> >>>
> >>> That's *all* it outputs. I have to assume that some other binary is
> >>> being linked on top of the wireshark binary (tshark et al seem
> >>> unaffected) but I don't recognize that option set.
> >>>
> >>> Any ideas? Has anybody seen this before?
> >>
> >> Weird. ./run/wireshark should be a shell script generated by
> CMakeLists.txt
> >> that execs run/Wireshark.app/Contents/MacOS/Wireshark.
> >
> > ...and that's not Wireshark's "invalid command-line argument" error
> message.
> >
> > So what does "file run/wireshark" print?
> >
> > And if it's a shell script, what does it contain?
>
> `run/wireshark` is a shell script pointing to
> `./run/Wireshark.app/Contents/MacOS/Wireshark` the way it should. That
> file is a Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64. Running that file directly
> has the same issues, so I suppose something is overwriting it or
> mis-linking it or something.
>

Just for fun I did a quick search for that Usage output (minus the
"Wireshark" prefix which is clearly $0) and found this program which has
that exact output:

https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/blob/master/tests/capturetest.c
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to