Hi,
This is run on a standard Windows7 PC with just the default extcaps.
This is the interfaces with the Preference off
C:\Development\wsbuild64>run\RelWithDebInfo\dumpcap.exe -D
1. \Device\NPF_{33D2B022-D2AC-40A3-BE47-C81B4F2EC346} (Wireless Network Connecti
on)
2. \Device\NPF_{F592C5E2-78A5-4C2C-87B5-4BB8682C9020} (Bluetooth Network Connect
ion)
3. \Device\NPF_{F0030874-E9A6-4B3F-8441-45E492FE6157} (Local Area Connection)And it’s with winpcap. Regards Anders From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Roland Knall Sent: den 9 januari 2018 15:12 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling with or without extcap I have 5 extcaps, and the difference is about half a second. Would be interesting, what kind of devices you have in your extcap list. But in general, I still think the main time is loading the rest of interfaces, extcap is a very small part, just pushed the whole time over the top. cheers On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com<mailto:anders.bro...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi, Startup time with extcap: 14:29:56.217 Main Info Wireshark is up and ready to go, elapsed time 5485000 us Startup time with the new extcap parameter OFF 14:30:40.559 Main Info Wireshark is up and ready to go, elapsed time 3521000 us Still a lot of time is spent with the local interfaces 14:30:39.304 Main Info fill_in_local_interfaces() starts : 14:30:40.216 Main Info fill_in_local_interfaces() ends, taking 0.912s 14:30:40.216 Dbg FIX: fetch recent color settings 14:30:40.216 Capture Dbg sync_interface_stats_open 14:30:40.216 Capture Dbg sync_pipe_open_command 14:30:40.497 Capture Dbg read 6 indicator: S empty value 14:30:40.559 Main Info Wireshark is up and ready to go, elapsed time 3521000 Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org>] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: den 8 januari 2018 02:46 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling with or without extcap On Jan 7, 2018, at 3:19 PM, Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com<mailto:rkn...@gmail.com>> wrote: > We had this discussion a bung of times. I have nothing against having a > preference, but I am very much against making not-loading extcap the default. > New users should not face a hassle to enable a capture interface, but > existing users, who wish to improve the performance in any way, can profit > from an option doing exactly that. > > So +1 on making this option available +1 > big -1 on making it default to not-loading +1 on the -1 :-) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
