Ben I think he is saying he already is passing the ref in the open window
but maybe he is not doing the dependent yes?
--
Dan Stein
Digital Software Solutions
799 Evergreen Circle
Telford PA 18969
Land: 215-799-0192
Mobile: 610-256-2843
Fax 413-410-9682
FMP, WiTango, EDI,SQL 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dss-db.com
> From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Intelisoft, Inc.
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:34:22 -0700
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Diagnostic Assistance Please! (Exceeded
> LicenseAgain)
>
> All well and good :-)
>
> But the URL of the Open window is what Witango is looking at.
>
> window.open("mysite.com/test.taf",SomeWindow,"dependant=yes")
> This will start a new user count
>
> window.open("mysite.com/test.taf?UserRef=blah",SomeWindow,"dependant=yes
> ")
> This will maintain the user count
>
> The dependant would help to prevent leaving an orphaned child window
> open an there for re-introduce the key.
>
> It's something to look into :-)
>
> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller
> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Atrix Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Diagnostic Assistance Please! (Exceeded
> LicenseAgain)
>
> hey, i read in my javascript book when you do the window.open you might
> have
> to set dependant to yes. In other words:
>
> window.open("mysite.com",SomeWindow,"dependant=yes")
>
> it says dependant was added in javascript 1.2 and opens it as a true
> child
> window of the parent window. When the parent window is closed, so is
> the
> child window. You might try this to see if the user reference doesnt
> change
> when its set to be dependant.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:44 PM
> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Diagnostic Assistance Please! (Exceeded
> LicenseAgain)
>
>
> Yup, already looked at that. I can't find any
> links/submits/window.opens that don't pass the user reference.
>
> Thanks, though.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:35 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Diagnostic Assistance Please!
>> (Exceeded LicenseAgain)
>>
>>
>> Are you passing the user reference with each page? It is
>> possible if you are not to spawn another reference I guess.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan Stein
>> Digital Software Solutions
>> 799 Evergreen Circle
>> Telford PA 18969
>> Land: 215-799-0192
>> Mobile: 610-256-2843
>> Fax 413-410-9682
>> FMP, WiTango, EDI,SQL 2000
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> www.dss-db.com
>>
>>
>>> From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:55:54 -0500
>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: Witango-Talk: Diagnostic Assistance Please!
>> (Exceeded License
>>> Again)
>>>
>>> OK, I've gotten licensing errors again. I got the logs
>> turned on and
>>> am trying to determine the problem. Tango2000 Small
>> Business Edition
>>> v4.01.001 on W2K server For the record, there's no possibility of
>>> upgrading this box to the Standard server edition in the
>> near future.
>>> If I can't get this working on the SB server, I'll have to find a
>>> different way to provide this app.
>>>
>>>
>>> I had 'system busy' / 'license exceeded' errors last on 6/2/03. I
>>> restarted the server & got the Tango logs running. I hit
>> errors again
>>> yesterday morning, 6/5/03 (about 2 hours after I checked
>> it, naturally
>>> - didn't see it was down till this morning). Please note that from
>>> ~10:30 yesterday morning until I restarted Tango server
>> today, my app
>>> was down completely - Tango server is NOT recovering from these
>>> errors. That is a huge part of the problem - I don't have
>> that many
>>> concurrent users, but when the licensing gets tripped, that's it
>>>
>>> I've found a number of oddities in the log - either this baby isn't
>>> working right, or I'm horribly confused.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are the "10 concurrent users" counted by
>> UserKey=<@UserReference>? Or
>>> is something else being counted to track this maximum?
>>>
>>> Are the UserKeys supposed to be expiring? I've got the variables
>>> timing out after 30 minutes (t4serverini,
>> VARIABLETIMEOUT=30). Does
>>> this also expire the UserKeys, or is something else involved?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks very much!
>>>
>>> jamileh
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> __
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> __________
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
>
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
