Hi Robert, If you know some C++ or grab a book on it, you can make DLL's that can be called from witango. If you do it this way, you dont have the overhead of having to "hack" together a solution using TCP and HTTP, but still have the compiled speed.
I was trying to do some of this a while back but for my particular case it turned out not to be as helpful as i hoped (i was basicly reinventing something that a database is more optimaly designed for). If your interested, i still have my partialy completed DLL code and all that...i could clean it up and send something to you that demonstrates the basics. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:23 AM Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > That is one of the reasons I brought this up. I am in the process of > developing methods for doing this, but I wanted to stimulate discusion, > and hopefully hear from Witango as to there plans for the future before > I spend the time. > > I have a method I developed where witango could pass data to an app, > and the app passes back the results, using TCP as the protocol and http > as the language. > > Robert. > > On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 11:06 AM, Sri Amudhanar wrote: > > > Can you use XMLRPC, or a network socket using C or Java and process > > critical code separately? > > Sri Amudhanar > > Maxys Corporation > > 703 729 0600 > > > > > > Robert Garcia wrote: > > > >> There are still ways of referencing objects dynamically, just not as > >> easily as in an interpreted language where tags are interpreted from > >> the inside out. > >> > >> I know I may be just dreaming here, but the current functionality of > >> the TCF is already there and working, I would just like the added > >> ability to compile it, and the compiler will make me have to apply > >> some stricter methods of writing the code, but that is a small price > >> to pay. > >> > >> Do you know where I can find recent documentation on the new bean > >> handler? I want to do some tests with beans, but there are many types > >> and ways to write beans, and I want to conform to how Witango handles > >> them. I have asked Witango, but have not heard back. They have no > >> excuse, it is not there indepence. ;-) > >> > >> Robert. > >> > >> > >> On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >> > >>> Interesting, > >>> > >>> As a matter of fact I use stored procedures in my database for a lot > >>> of > >>> the big looping of 10s of thousands of records. But that is not > >>> portable > >>> and doesn't solve the issue of looping speed within Witango. > >>> > >>> I see now that dynamics within loops with compiler based languages > >>> have > >>> come a long way since I last tried. > >>> > >>> I just don't want to loose the capability of dynamically creating > >>> object > >>> references. > >>> > >>> There is a plus side, the continual speed increase on processors. > >>> When I > >>> run it on a Pentium 2 400Mhz server it takes a minute and a half :-) > >>> > >>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>> Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>> Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller > >>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:16 PM > >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>> > >>> I thought of that, so I made the instantiation a domain scope, then > >>> removed it for the subsequent times. I was surprised, it didn't not > >>> seem to have any effect. It must have only added a few milliseconds. > >>> Either way the TCF method was slightly slower or the same. > >>> > >>> I agree that no one is going to look at that many years, but it was a > >>> good example to use as a comparison. > >>> > >>> The reason I am so hot on this, is that I have several reports that I > >>> need to write, that require alot of looping and processing, and it > >>> just > >>> > >>> chokes the witango server, and I need to right them in RB. I think if > >>> we had the choice quick and easy compiled code, then this would be > >>> less > >>> > >>> of a problem. > >>> > >>> Robert. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 02:55 PM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >>> > >>>> No doubt the instantiation of the object is the add second or 2. > >>>> > >>>> If I can find some time I might try server side javascript. > >>>> > >>>> But realistically, I did it for 1 year which is about the max period > >>>> someone would do, the TCF version on my 1.6gig P4 Laptop took a > >>> > >>> second. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Start 14:54:31 > >>>> > >>>> from 07/02/2003 to 07/02/2004 > >>>> Total Nbr Days 366 > >>>> Total Work Days 262 > >>>> > >>>> End 14:54:32 > >>>> > >>>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>>> Authorized Witango Reseller > >>>> http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>>> Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller > >>>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:49 PM > >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>>> > >>>> I have tested your new TAFs. The TAFs that don't call the TCF > >>>> method, > >>>> both run 14 to 15 seconds consistently. The TAF that calls the TCF > >>>> takes 15 to 16 seconds consistently. > >>>> > >>>> Does anyone have any updated docs on developing beans for use in > >>>> Witango? > >>>> > >>>> Robert. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 12:56 AM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Ok, so you are cleaning my clock :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> I have changed the calcs into a TCF and also matched your logic. > >>>>> > >>>>> Robert, Could you run the test against your server with the new > >>>>> "workdates3.taf" which calls "daycalc.tcf"? > >>>>> > >>>>> This will be a more accurate time run because it is using the > >>>>> seconds > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> model > >>>>> you used in RB. > >>>>> > >>>>> also included is the seconds logic in just a taf "workdates2.taf" > >>>>> (no > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> tcf > >>>>> call) > >>>>> could you run this time test on your server > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>>>> -Authorized WiTango Reseller > >>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>>>> -Authorized Alt-N Reseller > >>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:03 PM > >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> OK, I created an application in RealBasic, and compiled for all > >>>>> platforms. It can be downloaded here: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://public.bighead.net/workdaytest/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I also set up the workday taf on my test server and it can be run > >>>> > >>>> here: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> http://poh.bighead.net/workday/ > >>>>> > >>>>> With the default values, spanning 46020 days my witango v5.1.058 > >>>> > >>>> server > >>>> > >>>>> running on Windows 2000 server, AMD proc. running at 1.5ghz, with > >>>>> 512megs ram, and a 266FSB, it should take 15 seconds. If it takes > >>>>> longer, it is because a couple of you are hitting it at once. > >>>>> > >>>>> Now If I run my RB app on the same machine, it takes about 1/3 of a > >>>>> second if I do not give a progress indication, and about a second > >>>>> if > >>>> > >>> I > >>> > >>>>> do. That is even more of a performance increase than I expected. On > >>>> > >>> my > >>> > >>>>> mac, the results are about the same, except the progress calc takes > >>>>> just over 2 seconds. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, I am running my calc within its own thread. If I were to not > >>>>> thread the process, and disable background tasks, I could probably > >>>>> squeeze out another 10% performance. > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is my code from the RB method, you can download the rb project > >>>>> from the link above: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sub calcWDays() > >>>>> dim sDate,eDate,iDate as date > >>>>> dim nDays,wDays,sTicks,eTicks as double > >>>>> dim i as integer > >>>>> dim s as string > >>>>> > >>>>> sTicks = ticks > >>>>> > >>>>> sDate = new date > >>>>> eDate = new date > >>>>> > >>>>> sDate.year = sDateDC.year > >>>>> sDate.month = sDateDC.month > >>>>> sDate.day = sDateDC.day > >>>>> > >>>>> eDate.year = eDateDC.year > >>>>> eDate.month = eDateDC.month > >>>>> eDate.day = eDateDC.day > >>>>> > >>>>> nDays = (eDate.totalSeconds - sDate.totalSeconds)/86400 > >>>>> > >>>>> wDays = 0 > >>>>> iDate = new date > >>>>> iDate = sDate > >>>>> for i = 1 to nDays > >>>>> s = str(iDate.DayOfWeek) > >>>>> if iDate.dayofweek > 1 and iDate.dayofweek < 7 then > >>>>> wDays = wDays + 1 > >>>>> end if > >>>>> iDate.TotalSeconds = iDate.TotalSeconds + 86400 > >>>>> next > >>>>> eTicks = ticks > >>>>> s = "The total number of dates between "+sDate.abbreviatedDate+" > >>>>> and > >>>>> "+eDate.abbreviatedDate+" is "+str(nDays)+". " > >>>>> s = s + "The number of workdays in between is "+str(wDays)+" and > >>>>> the > >>>>> time taken to calculate was "+str((eTicks-sTicks)/60)+" seconds." > >>>>> msgBox s > >>>>> > >>>>> End Sub > >>>>> > >>>>> I tried to make the RB method as Identical to the one in Ben's taf > >>>>> as > >>>>> possible as you can see. sDateDC and eDateDC are the date control > >>>>> objects that the user interacts with. > >>>>> > >>>>> Robert. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 06:09 PM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Cool > >>>>>> and while you at it make the week day taf into a tcf and create a > >>>>> > >>> new > >>> > >>>>>> custom > >>>>>> tag called <@DATEDIFFWK> > >>>>>> LOL!. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>>>>> -Authorized WiTango Reseller > >>>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>>>>> -Authorized Alt-N Reseller > >>>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:05 PM > >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Actually, you could instantiate one field, then build an array of > >>>>>> fields to the nth, building an array of field objects, and then > >>>>>> loop > >>>>>> through them referencing like so: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> for x = 1 to 10000000 > >>>>>> field(x) = "some value" > >>>>>> next x > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just downloaded your weekday taf, I will do a test with it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Robert. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 04:51 PM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes, when all factors are know the compiled code is quick. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In your example you have 10 and it looks nice an simple. > >>>>>>> Now multiply it by 10 and then maintain it. :-P > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Take the example I just sent with workdates.taf > >>>>>>> write a case statement for all possible dates. Aaaaaah. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The number of times that I had a loop that I know all the > >>>>>>> factors I > >>>>>>> could probably count on my hands and ok I will take off my shoes > >>>>>> > >>>> also > >>>> > >>>>>>> ;-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The nature of a loop is dynamics, placing the case within the > >>>>>>> loop > >>>>>> > >>>> is > >>>> > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>> me not intuitive but is required for a compiler. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am just going by experience and IMHO I will take dynamics over > >>>>>>> compiled. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>>>>>> Authorized Witango Reseller > >>>>>> > >>>> http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>>> > >>>>>>> Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller > >>>>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 4:37 PM > >>>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There really is no increase in code. I do this all the time in a > >>>>>>> single > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> conditional statement like: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> for x = 1 to 10 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> select case x > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> case 1 > >>>>>>> field_1 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 2 > >>>>>>> field_2 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 3 > >>>>>>> field_3 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 4 > >>>>>>> field_4 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 5 > >>>>>>> field_5 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 6 > >>>>>>> field_6 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 7 > >>>>>>> field_7 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 8 > >>>>>>> field_8 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 9 > >>>>>>> field_9 = "some value" > >>>>>>> case 10 > >>>>>>> field_10 = "some value" > >>>>>>> next x > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There are other ways also, this is the simplest. Another way is > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>> build an array of objects, and loop through them. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think you underestimate the level of performance gain you get > >>>>>> > >>> when > >>> > >>>>>>> you compile versus interpret on the fly on complex tasks. > >>>>>> > >>> Especially > >>> > >>>>>>> processing loops. I will do a test and get back to this with some > >>>>>>> results. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Robert. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 02:32 PM, Ben Johansen wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You are correct, and this is where I question the speed boost. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On one hand you have the quicker run speed but on the other hand > >>>>>>> > >>>> you > >>>> > >>>>>>>> have the increased amount of code due to lose of this dynamic. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There is no easy conversion of code and mindset between them. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > >>>>>>>> Authorized Witango Reseller > >>>>>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > >>>>>>>> Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller > >>>>>>>> http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:20 PM > >>>>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and TCFs > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> dynamic referencing a table is one thing, that should be ok. > >>>>>>>> What > >>>>>>> > >>> I > >>> > >>>>>>>> mean is referencing an object dynamically like you can do with > >>>>>>>> javascript/flash with the eval() function. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For instance, in javascript/flash, if you have a set of fields, > >>>>>>>> named > >>>>>>>> field_1, and field_2, and so on to field_10, they could be > >>>>>>>> referenced > >>>>>>>> dynamically like so: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> for x = 1 to 10 > >>>>>>>> eval("field_"+str(x)) = "some value" > >>>>>>>> next x > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The same could be done in witango with a bunch of arguments, > >>>>>>>> <@arg > >>>>>>>> field_1>, and so on. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <@for start=1 stop=10 step=1> > >>>>>>>> <@addrows local$newArray <@arg field_<@currow>>> > >>>>>>>> </@for> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't believe this could be done in a compiled language. You > >>>>>>> > >>>> would > >>>> > >>>>>>>> have to use a select case method or build an array of objects or > >>>>>>>> something. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Robert. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 01:47 PM, Atrix Wolfe wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> you could still do dynamic referencing if they made allowances > >>>>>>>> > >>> for > >>> > >>>>>>> it, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> like > >>>>>>>>> if they stored a table w/ the names of the vars and pointers to > >>>>>>>>> them. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you can make java bytecodes though and then use gcc to make > >>>>>>>> > >>>> that > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> into an > >>>>>>>>> executable or dynamic library, would you really need With to > >>>>>>>>> make > >>>>>>>> > >>>> a > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> witango > >>>>>>>>> compiler? That is assuming you dont lose anything like dynamic > >>>>>>>>> referencing > >>>>>>>>> in either of those 2 steps. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I've been kind of wondering about this since With said you > >>>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>> make > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> tango > >>>>>>>>> into java bytecodes though...if you made your code into java > >>>>>>>>> bytecodes, does > >>>>>>>>> it support dynamic referencing TCF's, includes etc? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Just wondering if could expect any and all code to work the > >>>>>>>>> same > >>>>>>>>> whether it > >>>>>>>>> was tango or java bytecodes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>>>>> From: "Robert Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:25 PM > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Boosting Server Performance, and > >>>>>>>>> TCFs > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Just because our tafs would be compiled in some native format, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> doesn't > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mean we would have to start worrying about things garbage > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> collection. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The compiled tcf would would have in/out points and process > >>>>>>>>>> data > >>>>>>>>>> within. It would run within the memory space of the witango > >>>>>>>>>> server, > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> the server would handle the garbage collection and the nasty > >>>>>>>>>> stuff. > >>>>>>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>>> main benefit would be that complex methods in a tcf would not > >>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>> scripted, but compiled so that there would be no tag > >>>>>>>>>> processing > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> other performance drags that are inherant with an interpreted > >>>>>>>>>> language. > >>>>>>>>>> It would mean, though, that certain things you can do in a tml > >>>>>>>>> > >>> or > >>> > >>>>>>>> taf, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> you could not do, like dynamic referencing. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Robert. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Scott Cadillac wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> But it does add several layers of complexity too. I'm not an > >>>>>>>>>>> expert > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>> level by any means, but it seams to me that Witango isn't > >>>>>>>>>>> ready > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> support > >>>>>>>>>>> this kind of low-level environment (nor any interpreted > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> language > >>> > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> matter, e.g., ColdFusion). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> For example, garbage collection and other memory allocation > >>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>> sort of Metatags would we need for this? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Robert Garcia > >>>>>>>>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>>>>>>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>>>>>>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>>>>>>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>>>>>>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> http://theradmac.com/ > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> > >>>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> __ > >>>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> _ > >>>> > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Robert Garcia > >>>>>>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>>>>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>>>>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>>>>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>>>>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - > >>>>>>>> http://theradmac.com/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> _ > >>>> > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> _ > >>>> > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Robert Garcia > >>>>>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>>>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>>>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>>>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>>>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - > >>>>>>> http://theradmac.com/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> _ > >>>> > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> _ > >>>> > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> _ > >>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Robert Garcia > >>>>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - http://theradmac.com/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> __ > >>>> > >>>>>> _ > >>>>>> _ > >>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> ____________________________________________________________________ > >>>> __ > >>>> > >>>>>> _ > >>>>>> _ > >>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> Robert Garcia > >>>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - http://theradmac.com/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ > >>> > >>>>> _ > >>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ > >>> > >>>>> _ > >>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to > >>>>> http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf<WorkDates2.zip> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Robert Garcia > >>>> President - BigHead Technology > >>>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - http://theradmac.com/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ > >>> > >>>> _ > >>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ > >>> > >>>> _ > >>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Robert Garcia > >>> President - BigHead Technology > >>> CTO - eventpix.com > >>> 2781 N Carlmont Pl > >>> Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > >>> ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - http://theradmac.com/ > >>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ _ > >>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>> > >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > >>> __ _ > >>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > _ > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > > > > > > -- > > Robert Garcia > President - BigHead Technology > CTO - eventpix.com > 2781 N Carlmont Pl > Simi Valley, Ca 93065 > ph: 805.522.8577 - cell: 805.501.1390 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/ - http://theradmac.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________ > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
