Well that's two votes for userRefReset then :) For visitors coming in via search engines, we get REFERER with 'good' contents, usually the search URI that was used.
Further to what Atrix reported earlier with R:Tango 5, I've tested on NT4.0 server with IIS 4 & T2K, if the same userref is presented by a multiple browsers while a session is current, then the user scope is common amongst those clients. Anyone want to chip in with W5 062 results? Regards, Jason. | With Imagination www.wi.com.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | P 02 9929 9229 M 0411 288 596 F 02 9460 4770 | | Planning, Implementation and Management of Web Applications | > From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:28:16 -0700 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: RE: Reusing the UserReference key > > Hi, > > I see where your going here, I have a couple of comments on > > your question 1. > 1. Ironically I am working on a project that uses referrer to pay on > referral leads. > 2. I have found very few times where REFERER = <@CGIPARAM REFERER> has > anything in it. > > your question 3. > 1. this is would be great new feature like a configuration variable like > "userRefReset" > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com > -Authorized WiTango Reseller > http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm > -Authorized Alt-N Reseller > http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
