Thats a good point, but correct me if I am wrong, that is not enough. You must 
also disable witango from parsing the URL looking for the userreference, or 
session can still be hijacked. I think that is in system configuration.

--

Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
15520 Coutelenc Rd
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[email protected] - [email protected]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/

On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Roland Dumas wrote:

> A long-term and easily addressed security issue with tango/witango is the use 
> of _userreference argument in the URL. The builders default to using this. 
> LIkely, back in the early pre-pleistocene days of tango, it was practical to 
> pass this argument in the URL because of cookies being blocked or something 
> like that. Using this feature enables session hijacking and other evils. If 
> you use builders, you should strip out this URL argument. Otherwise, don't do 
> it.
>
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Deutschendorf, Steve {Dutch} (MSFC-IS30) wrote:
>
>> Well, I misspoke, we also have a few v5.0.1 sites.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Robert.
>>
>> Steve Deutschendorf/IS30
>> NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center
>> Office of the CIO/Applications Team
>> MSFC Account Authorization Official (AAO),
>> MAMS/MIW, NISE, NAMS, MICS, AIM, SRS
>> Phone: 256-544-2250
>>
>>
>> From: Robert Garcia <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:00:30 -0600
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Alternate Dumb Question Thread: Security
>>
>> The only real security issue we ever worried about with witango, is SQL 
>> injection, and then just poor coding as it relates to login methodologies 
>> where there are "holes", that would occur on any platform. So you should 
>> always use BIND or database actions, not custom inserts/updates when user 
>> inputted data is going into a query.
>>
>> Witango had a flaw that was patched, so make sure you are on the latest 5.5. 
>> Witango will be secure, because it has so little market share, no one is 
>> likely to work to exploit it. Anyway, other than that one buffer overflow 
>> security patch, I have not seen or heard of a security flaw that was related 
>> to witango, it has always been due to poor coding.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Robert Garcia
>> President - BigHead Technology
>> VP Application Development - eventpix.com <http://eventpix.com>
>> 15520 Coutelenc Rd
>> Magalia, Ca 95954
>> ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
>> [email protected] - [email protected]
>> http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Deutschendorf, Steve {Dutch} (MSFC-IS30) wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> We've had (Wi)Tango around for a dozen years and I can say it's been worry 
>>> free in our environment.  The fact that it still functions after various 
>>> degrees of support (or not) over those years is a credit to the 
>>> foundational work. I can't say that I've seen much discussion on the 
>>> security implications of the product along the way, so let me ask...
>>>
>>> What are the security implications in remaining with v5.5 for some of our 
>>> legacy applications?  Looks like we'll be moving to a different environment 
>>> over time (for various support reasons), so I just wanted to appreciate the 
>>> risk of hanging with my current version.  I realize the product/OS support 
>>> will eventually force an upward migration.  Are there current issues with 
>>> v5.5 that I may be unaware or is it by it’s very nature strictly dependent 
>>> on the security gaps in the OS or database?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Steve Deutschendorf/IS30
>>> NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center
>>> Office of the CIO/Applications Team
>>> Phone: 256-544-2250
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
>>> with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
>> with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
>> with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
> with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.



----------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.

Reply via email to