> 
> Oh heck yes, I am completely addicted to Visual Assist.  Until Eclipse
> or whatever gets something equivalent in functionality, it will
> *never* be useful to me.  And I know many others like me who think the
> same way.

I have found that Visual Assist can't deal with the heavy duty template
stuff found in WTL applications.  Or is that a figment of my imagination?

> 
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Bhushan Inamdar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Coming to .NET ADOs and stuff, you are right. I did not know that we
> can
> >> work with ODBC in similar fashion as ADO.NET or can we? Can we have
> a
> >> disconnected architecture and caching capabilities? How performant
> is that
> >> using ODBC?
> 
> You would need to build some of those functionalities on top of ODBC,
> but in general, ODBC is *slow*.  It was not designed to be fast, and
> it has a limited feature set as it is designed to work with all
> databases (but none of them 'well'), that is why ADO.Net added so many
> features because it is trying to work around the slowdowns caused be
> ODBC.  I would stay away from it.  I had to work with it for a few
> years about a decade ago, it was horrible, and it has not changed...
> Wait until Wt::DBO comes out and adds more back-ends.  :)

In a possible upcoming project, I'll need to access data in an MS SQL
database.  Is there a recommendation on a C++ driver that gets close (ie is
fast) with regards to query and stored procedure access against the
database? 


> 
> 
> 
> XML:  <my-tag attr=42>Hi!</my-tag>
> Sexp: (my-tag (attr 42) Hi!)
> 

But isn't the '</my-tag>'  in xml the equivalent of the ')' in sexp, so you
still have a tail tag, no matter what you call it or what it does.  Xml is
just a bit wordier, and in a fashion, it is self-error-checking.  If one
drops a ')', processing sync may be lost, but with an un-end-tag, you can
get an idea of what was lost.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to