On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Dmitriy Igrishin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all! > So for our project we have selected Wt, however yet have not decided Wt or > JWt. > Key role in our project plays RDBMS. The majority of logic will handle > RDBMS. > For complete readiness of our project it is necessary to make the UI. > Is very tempting to use Wt, instead of JWt. But there are doubts: > 1. For certain it is necessary to use a servers of the same architecture or > to write a cross-platform code. We are afraid runtime errors in production;
Wt is cross-platform, therefore that should not be a problem. You only need to worry about the other features you implement. > 2. There is no well realised library on C ++ for operation with PostgreSQL > (in SOCI bytea data type is not supported), therefore it is necessary to use > native library on C - libpq; What's wrong with using a C library? Or libpqxx? ( http://pqxx.org/ ) -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
