On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Ray Burkholder <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> 2. There is no well realised library on C ++ for operation with
>> PostgreSQL
>> >> (in SOCI bytea data type is not supported), therefore it is
>> necessary to use
>> >> native library on C - libpq;
>> >
>> > What's wrong with using a C library? Or libpqxx? ( http://pqxx.org/ )
>>
>> Or Wt::Dbo once it has a PG backend?
>>
>
> I have been using the libpq library for use with my wt stuff.  It allows me
> to marshall my parameters directly into an array of variables for passing to
> the engine.  This eliminates most avenues of sql hack attacks.
>
> Last time I checked, libpqxx and soci were unable to provide that ability.
>
> If a backend for Wt::Dbo could do that, terrific.  I don't have the time to
> do it at the moment, but from what I see, the basic
> select/insert/update/delete operations in libpq might simply be done up as a
> series of templates.  This would allow variable number of parameters, and
> provide specific types for each parameter (for fastest calling capability).
> For slightly slower calls, boost::variant might be useful in this regard.

Actually, Variant is faster then you might think when properly used,
but Boost.Fusion would have been perfect.

However, Wt.Dbo is a bit higher level, but it does it pretty well
though, and from my reading in that back-end, that is the only way it
passes things.  It actually creates generated procedures, and binds
variables to those when it calls it, so yes, it is *very* safe like
that.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to