On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Dmitriy Igrishin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey all! >> So for our project we have selected Wt, however yet have not decided Wt or >> JWt. >> Key role in our project plays RDBMS. The majority of logic will handle >> RDBMS. >> For complete readiness of our project it is necessary to make the UI. >> Is very tempting to use Wt, instead of JWt. But there are doubts: >> 1. For certain it is necessary to use a servers of the same architecture or >> to write a cross-platform code. We are afraid runtime errors in production; > > Wt is cross-platform, therefore that should not be a problem. You only > need to worry about the other features you implement. > >> 2. There is no well realised library on C ++ for operation with PostgreSQL >> (in SOCI bytea data type is not supported), therefore it is necessary to use >> native library on C - libpq; > > What's wrong with using a C library? Or libpqxx? ( http://pqxx.org/ )
Or Wt::Dbo once it has a PG backend? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
