On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Frank Tegtmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:

>> If "alternate package repositories" means the repository mentioned in
>> the wiki (i. e. my PPA), the "risk" is exactly the same "risk" you
>> incur by using the official Ubuntu package.
>
> I tried this on another machine first and the result was that once
> I added the repository half of the system was replaced when I updated.
> Maybe I made a mistake but this is nothing I expected. What I expected
> was the addition of Wt and the replacement of Boost and perhaps
> zlib and libgd.

I see. You are right: my PPA contains a lot of stuff :-)

I was going to replace my PPA with a Wt-only repository at OpenSuse
Build Service but OBS is horrible for Ubuntu packages (universe is not
available). Maybe I should have a PPA only for Wt and Boost ?

-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to