On 25.02.2012 13:13, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 at 12:45:46 +0100, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski escribió:
Thank you for this suggestion. So for now I have:
- old GNUstep button (to configure Window Maker)
- terminal
- distro specific configurator (Mageia Control Center)
- wmcalclock
- wmsystemtray
- wmudmount
In the autostart:
- nm-applet
I don't like nm-applet:
Depends: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4), libc6 (>= 2.4), libcairo-gobject2 (>= 1.10.0), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.0.2),
libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.88), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.31.1), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>=
2.22.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0), libgnome-bluetooth8 (>= 2.91.2), libgnome-keyring0 (>= 3.2.2-2~), libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.0.0),
libnm-glib-vpn1 (>= 0.7.999), libnm-glib4 (>= 0.8.998), libnm-gtk0 (>= 0.9.1.95), libnm-util2 (>= 0.8.998), libnotify4 (>= 0.7.0),
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0), gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2), network-manager (>= 0.9.2), policykit-1-gnome, gnome-icon-theme, dbus-x11
Do you have a better alternative? That's not a rethorical question,
I really want to know what other people do.
But for the same reasons I prefer the simple wmvolman over wmudmount
because wmudmount pulls a lot of libraries (but probably the same ones
as nm-applet).
The lists: [1]
Requirements of wmudmount
libX11.so.6
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.9)
libdbus-1.so.3
libdbus-glib-1.so.2
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgio-2.0.so.0
libglib-2.0.so.0
libgnome-keyring.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libm.so.6
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libnotify.so.4
libpthread.so.0
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
Requirements of networkmanager-plugin:
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
libcairo.so.2
libdbus-1.so.3
libdbus-glib-1.so.2
libgconf-2.so.4
libgdk-3.so.0
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
libglib-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libgnome-bluetooth.so.10
libgnome-keyring.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libgtk-3.so.0
libnm-glib-vpn.so.1
libnm-glib.so.4
libnm-gtk.so.0
libnm-util.so.2
libnotify.so.4
libpango-1.0.so.0
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
libpthread.so.0
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0)
networkmanager
rtld(GNU_HASH)
So it's comparable, and the dependencies are similar.
From the Arch Linux wiki:
"HAL has become deprecated in favor of udev, udisks, upower, etc. and is
no longer developed. Currently, a small number of programs still rely on
and use HAL, though development is heading toward utilizing udev as a
replacement." [2] So I prefer to maintain Udisk one.. without caring of
a few additional dependencies.
So it's not about how many libraries you pull, but
if you can keep it simple, better.
But Kamil is the distro maintainer and that's his call to make.
And _note_ that a distro setting up a few dockapps doesn't mean
that wmaker is getting bloated, it's all separated stuff. If you
are a Mageia user and don't like Kamil's choices, just kill the
dockapp and be done with it. Really.
It's even simpler:
- featured "urpmi windowmaker",
- raw "urpmi --no-suggests windowmaker".
[1] lists from pkgs.org
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HAL
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
