On Sun, 12 May 2013 at 13:13:45 +0200, Christophe wrote:
> 
> ----- Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) <k...@kix.es> a écrit :
> > 
> > Only one comment about this patch. The file funcs.h contains prototypes
> > for multiple files, and funcs.c doesn't exist. IMO, is better move the
> > prototypes to the right header file, and remove funcs.h.
> 
> Hi, Short answer: That's beyond the goal of this patch. This patch does
> not conceptually changes the header, it just makes it easier to work
> with.
> 
> Long answer: Well, now that's easier to split it ;-) The current
> situation for header is not great, there are a few things worse and
> working on this patch series pointed it to me. On personal taste, I'm
> in favour to not expand unwisely the alreay-to-big number of header.
> Specifically, I dislike headers for just one or two definitions; but I
> also approve your idea to have things separated, specially when it
> tries to lead to overbig header files...
> 
> So basically, before doing anything there, I'll wait to get the project
> maintainer's point of view... (Carlos, that's a subtle hint to catch
> you into the troll!)

I tend to prefer having separate header files matching their .c files.
It is simpler conceptually.

I have no strong feelings about it though. You are doing a great job
and you can proceed as you think it's best to fix the remaining issues.


-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.

Reply via email to