On Friday 13 October 2006 20:54, Jeffrey Lim wrote: > Consider the old wmii-2 way of handling the float layout in terms of > z-stacking - it was very intuitive, and quite plain and simple. What u > expected (intuitively) was what u really got. If u had window 1 at the > top of the z-stack, and then subsequently brought window 2 up to the > top (by cycling to it), window 3 and 4 did not also pop up to the top > too for no apparent reason to obscure window 1. The natural user will > naturally start to think... "what the .... for????"
+1 I didn't come to WMII until v3, so I wasn't aware that it ever behaved differently... but I agree that this is WMII's most aggrivating behavior at the moment. -- ### SER ### Deutsch|Esperanto|Francaise|Linux|XML|Java|Ruby|Aikido|Iaido ### http://www.ser1.net jabber.com:ser ICQ:83578737 ### GPG: http://www.ser1.net/Security/ser_public.gpg
