On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:04:36AM +0100, Denis Grelich wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:46:26 +0100 > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know Uriel will declare my proposal retarded as well, but why > > not mapping the complete data structure as is into a > > fs-representation? With a reworked libixp this might work pretty > > well and this way anyone can manipulate any struct field which > > one wants to manipulate. You'd need to write a manipulation > > handler for each struct only which is used on fs-access. > > One can overdo everything ;) > I don't see where it would be easier to write shell scripts or having > yet another layer to do window management, than just modifying the > source if you are so unhappy with what the wm does. > > > I agree that this design sucks to some extend, but it is > > simplier and more straight-forward than 'trying to find a sane > > fs design' - the proposal of JG was fine, however I doubt it > > will be implemented... > > Could someone please point me to what "the proposal of JG" actually > was? I was looking for it, but had a hard time finding anything > concrete.
I think this thread contains several starting points: http://suckless.org/pipermail/wmii/2006-June/002168.html -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
