KIMURA Masaru wrote:
Hi,
2009/5/6 Robert C Corsaro <[email protected]>:
KIMURA Masaru wrote:
Hi,
2009/5/6 Robert C Corsaro <[email protected]>:
Does anyone maintain a portage overlay for tip wmii?
[SNIP]
http://dev.gentoo.gr.jp/~hiyuh/cgi-bin/hgweb.cgi/file/tip/x11-wm/wmii-hg
Ah, great, thank you. �If you need anything done, like moving it to the
googlecode mirror, I can help.
This wmii's ebuild is just for one of my miscellaneous overlay that
doesn't come from as gentoo's official ones. If you'd like to maintain
only wmii related apps (or, suckless.org apps?), you can copy to fork
w/o my blame.
If Kris encourages to share this ebuilds under code.suckless.org or
wmii.googlecode.com, I have no objection to separate that ebuilds from
my other craps.
KIMURA,
Sounds good. I'll probably change a few things while I'm at it. Any
reason you use $package-hg instead of $package-9999? I'm just wondering
as I've always used 9999 to indicate tip in my ebuilds.
Kris,
* I notice in the official ebuild, and KIMURA's ebuild there is some sed
hacking of config.mk. Does it make sence to just package a
config.local.mk with the ebuild, or is there some reason why sed hacking
is better?
* Can I safely assume that dmenu tip and libixp tip will be dependencies
for wmii tip? Are there any others?
* I can, as KIMURA suggested, make this a suckless overlay. This might
warrent having it's own repo on suckless. I'll already be including
ebuilds for dmenu and libixp. I don't know if I'll get around to making
ebuilds for all suckless packages, but it's a good starting point if
someone else comes along with some more. What do you think?
