ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Actually this was not intented as insult or something. It simply
gives an idea of achieving good software quality after some
time. Often people request features which could easily replace
existing features (like tags replace not only pages/workspaces,
they even make attach/detach/sendtopage totally deprecated,
apart from the 'detached clients layer' and the 'pager') - the
introduction of tags is a good sample how you can making
software more powerful due removing features.
In case where features overlap, or when a new feature would be a simple
extension of existing ones, that is a good principle.
(I recently declined(!) several patches
implementing icon support for the bar and in general for
liblitz).
I personally don't want any unnecessary graphics, but some might. Would
it be a good idea to have some place for storing such patches for those
who might want them (and leaving it for them to get them actually
compile)? ... or then not.
Jani
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
