On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:01:01PM +0200, Jani H. Lahtinen wrote: > ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > >Actually this was not intented as insult or something. It simply > >gives an idea of achieving good software quality after some > >time. Often people request features which could easily replace > >existing features (like tags replace not only pages/workspaces, > >they even make attach/detach/sendtopage totally deprecated, > >apart from the 'detached clients layer' and the 'pager') - the > >introduction of tags is a good sample how you can making > >software more powerful due removing features. > > > > > In case where features overlap, or when a new feature would be a simple > extension of existing ones, that is a good principle. > > >(I recently declined(!) several patches > >implementing icon support for the bar and in general for > >liblitz). > > > > > I personally don't want any unnecessary graphics, but some might. Would > it be a good idea to have some place for storing such patches for those > who might want them (and leaving it for them to get them actually > compile)? ... or then not.
Ask Denis Grelich if he is willing to adapt his changes once wmii-3 is released. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
