Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:01:01PM +0200, Jani H. Lahtinen wrote: >> ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote: >> >>> Actually this was not intented as insult or something. It simply >>> gives an idea of achieving good software quality after some >>> time. Often people request features which could easily replace >>> existing features (like tags replace not only pages/workspaces, >>> they even make attach/detach/sendtopage totally deprecated, >>> apart from the 'detached clients layer' and the 'pager') - the >>> introduction of tags is a good sample how you can making >>> software more powerful due removing features. >>> >>> >> In case where features overlap, or when a new feature would be a simple >> extension of existing ones, that is a good principle. >> >>> (I recently declined(!) several patches >>> implementing icon support for the bar and in general for >>> liblitz). >>> >>> >> I personally don't want any unnecessary graphics, but some might. Would >> it be a good idea to have some place for storing such patches for those >> who might want them (and leaving it for them to get them actually >> compile)? ... or then not. > > Ask Denis Grelich if he is willing to adapt his changes once > wmii-3 is released.
Of course he is ;) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
