On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:38:57AM -0700, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > - From what I've learned from regulars in IRC, wmii-4 development has > lost steam. Some say this was bound to happen because garbeam left > wmii-4 to pursue dwm. That's fine if you like dwm, but those of us > still dependent on wmii-3.1 are presently screwed because there > isn't a stable wmii-4 release yet. Actually I didn't expected that wmii-4 development would loss its steam. There were people claiming they will continue (Kris, Uriel, etc.). I wanted to have a break for other tools which seem more important to me (st, taggi2, dwm, an editor, etc), and because of the impression that wmii development got a never ending story which resulted in CATD and many direction changes because of new ideas (which was my mistake). I also was fed up with Uriels contineously criticism of my code though he never contributed any C code to proof his expertise. However, if I wouldn't have listened to Uriel, wmii won't be what it is now (no 9P, no tagging, ...), thus I'm also happy about Uriels insights.
Neither me nor Uriel (I talked to him recently) has heared anything of Kris (aka John-Galt in #irc) recently, thus I cannot say what the current situation is. I'd ask for some more patience, maybe Kris is on holidays or has got some real work todo for the moment or other serious problems of more importance... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ wmii@wmii.de mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii