On Oct 13, 2011, at 2:57 AM, danny burstein wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Doug Elrod wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2:33 pm, Steven Otte <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Oh, that's our Rupe! Is there an ethical convention he WON'T violate?!
>>
>> Wow. 41% of the European edition daily "sales" in 2010 were due to
>> this scheme? And they're claiming it passed legal muster? AND was
>> approved by the Audit Bureau of Circulation? We'd better have a
>> follow up report on WHAT IS GOING ON AT THE ABoC!
>>
>> -Doug Elrod ([email protected])
>> This ranks pretty high among the duties a newspaper owes its
>> advertisers, doesn't it?
>
> In the USofA this type of game playing has led to some pretty
> hefty court cases, fines, penalties, paybacks-to-advertisers,
> and... even some criminal prosecutions.
Wall Street Journal, Thursday edition: Unjust prosecution from meddling
investigators destroys 2/5th of newspaper circulation; viability of
corporations threatened by ongoing interference in free market.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"World News Now Discussion List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en.
