On 31 Mar 2011, at 22:21, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 31/03/2011 10:54, Paul Sharples wrote: >> On 14/03/2011 11:48, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> On 14/03/2011 09:29, Scott Wilson wrote: > > ... > > I've done some work on this (finally). I've moved all the docs into our > growing CMS based site (but not committed yet as SVN is down right now). > > I've done some testing, but only of the source release since a problem > emerged on the Apache servers after I got that zip. > > The first thing that strikes me is that since these candidates were built > such a long time ago and since we have done some good work in Wookie since > then, should we just build some new release candidates? > > I'm tempted to say no, lets just get this out of the door. Bypass the Ant 1.8 > issue by not officially releasing the source versions and following up fairly > quickly with 0.9.1? > > Getting two releases out the door quickly will not only look good from a > community perspective but will also allow us to fine tune the release process. > > However, if you would prefer to just get one release out then we can build > new release candidates now and have the fixes between this release candidate > and now included in 0.9 > > Thoughts?
My preference is to release 0.9.0 now and move quickly to 0.9.1. For 0.9.0 I think we have two options: 1. Release as-is, with a release note regarding the Ant 1.8 issue 2. Fix the Ant issue in the 0.9.0 branch first and recreate the packages I'm fine with either. > > Ross
