On 01/04/2011 09:11, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 31 Mar 2011, at 22:21, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 31/03/2011 10:54, Paul Sharples wrote:
On 14/03/2011 11:48, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 14/03/2011 09:29, Scott Wilson wrote:
...
I've done some work on this (finally). I've moved all the docs into our growing
CMS based site (but not committed yet as SVN is down right now).
I've done some testing, but only of the source release since a problem emerged
on the Apache servers after I got that zip.
The first thing that strikes me is that since these candidates were built such
a long time ago and since we have done some good work in Wookie since then,
should we just build some new release candidates?
I'm tempted to say no, lets just get this out of the door. Bypass the Ant 1.8
issue by not officially releasing the source versions and following up fairly
quickly with 0.9.1?
Getting two releases out the door quickly will not only look good from a
community perspective but will also allow us to fine tune the release process.
However, if you would prefer to just get one release out then we can build new
release candidates now and have the fixes between this release candidate and
now included in 0.9
Thoughts?
My preference is to release 0.9.0 now and move quickly to 0.9.1.
For 0.9.0 I think we have two options:
1. Release as-is, with a release note regarding the Ant 1.8 issue
2. Fix the Ant issue in the 0.9.0 branch first and recreate the packages
I'm fine with either.
I say we release as is 0.9.0 (all three builds - src, standalone & war),
and include any info in the notes. I think we should then be looking to
get another one out very soon.
Ross
