On 1 Apr 2011, at 10:29, Paul Sharples wrote: > On 01/04/2011 10:11, Paul Sharples wrote: >> On 01/04/2011 09:11, Scott Wilson wrote: >>> On 31 Mar 2011, at 22:21, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>>> On 31/03/2011 10:54, Paul Sharples wrote: >>>>> On 14/03/2011 11:48, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>>>> On 14/03/2011 09:29, Scott Wilson wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> I've done some work on this (finally). I've moved all the docs into our >>>> growing CMS based site (but not committed yet as SVN is down right now). >>>> >>>> I've done some testing, but only of the source release since a problem >>>> emerged on the Apache servers after I got that zip. >>>> >>>> The first thing that strikes me is that since these candidates were built >>>> such a long time ago and since we have done some good work in Wookie since >>>> then, should we just build some new release candidates? >>>> >>>> I'm tempted to say no, lets just get this out of the door. Bypass the Ant >>>> 1.8 issue by not officially releasing the source versions and following up >>>> fairly quickly with 0.9.1? >>>> >>>> Getting two releases out the door quickly will not only look good from a >>>> community perspective but will also allow us to fine tune the release >>>> process. >>>> >>>> However, if you would prefer to just get one release out then we can build >>>> new release candidates now and have the fixes between this release >>>> candidate and now included in 0.9 >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> My preference is to release 0.9.0 now and move quickly to 0.9.1. >>> >>> For 0.9.0 I think we have two options: >>> >>> 1. Release as-is, with a release note regarding the Ant 1.8 issue >>> 2. Fix the Ant issue in the 0.9.0 branch first and recreate the packages >>> >>> I'm fine with either. >>> >> >> I say we release as is 0.9.0 (all three builds - src, standalone & war), and >> include any info in the notes. I think we should then be looking to get >> another one out very soon. > > Just to expand on that I mean I would rebuild the 0.9.0 branch to recreate > the builds with the added KEYS file (containing the commiters public keys) > and new updated NOTES file (containing the few issues we found in > WOOKIE-181), then sign the binaries. Additionally the ant build-release > tasks also make tar archives which are not currently on my people.apache.org > space. (if you want to double check these then use the ant build-release task > in the 0.9.0 branch to build them yourself). Nothing has changed in the > branch since i built them last time, so they should in theory be exactly the > same. > > Is there anything I've missed?
Sounds good to me > >> >>>> Ross >> >
