>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:19 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Monthly Release Schedule
>
>
>On 26 Apr 2012, at 12:15, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:20 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Monthly Release Schedule
>>>
>>> On 04/25/2012 11:29 PM, Paul Sharples wrote:
>>>> On 25/04/2012 22:20, Scott Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 25 Apr 2012, at 21:11, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As Ross suggested elsewhere on list, Wookie could use a regular
>release
>>>>>> schedule. To this end, I propose that we commit to monthly releases
>>> initiated
>>>>>> on the 15th of every month. Assuming the other mentors have time to
>>> review
>>>>>> with me, this will put the Wookie releases in line with Rave's end of
>>> month
>>>>>> cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think May 15th is a good first target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good - having a date to work towards should focus our minds on
>>> which
>>>>> issues we really do want to tackle as priorities.
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> Definitely +1
>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW: I've put the first draft of the release procedure up on the wookie
>>> site...
>>>>
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/docs/developer/release-
>process.html
>>>>
>>>> It will need to be refined a little here and there, but the majority of the
>>>> text/process is now there.
>>>
>>> Great work Paul!
>>> I haven't really read it all in detail yet but you're covering a lot of 
>>> detail
>>> for sure. Very cool.
>>
>> +1. Looks great.
>>
>> As with most documentation, most of the holes will come to light when
>someone tries to follow it.  What about having someone else try their hand at
>cutting a release on May 15th?
>
>Good idea - its also useful to make sure more people are familiar with the
>process.
>
>Any volunteers..?

No one wants to give it a shot? 

>
>>>
>>> Ate
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>

Reply via email to