I have two hours in my calendar to review and vote on the 16th - you
bet I'm ready!

Ross

On 14 May 2012 19:39, Franklin, Matthew B. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Scott Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:09 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Monthly Release Schedule
>>
>>
>>On 2 May 2012, at 22:09, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Scott Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:19 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Monthly Release Schedule
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26 Apr 2012, at 12:15, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:20 AM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Monthly Release Schedule
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/25/2012 11:29 PM, Paul Sharples wrote:
>>>>>>> On 25/04/2012 22:20, Scott Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 25 Apr 2012, at 21:11, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As Ross suggested elsewhere on list, Wookie could use a regular
>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> schedule. To this end, I propose that we commit to monthly releases
>>>>>> initiated
>>>>>>>>> on the 15th of every month. Assuming the other mentors have time
>>to
>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>> with me, this will put the Wookie releases in line with Rave's end of
>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>> cycle.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think May 15th is a good first target.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds good - having a date to work towards should focus our minds
>>on
>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>> issues we really do want to tackle as priorities.
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Definitely +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW: I've put the first draft of the release procedure up on the wookie
>>>>>> site...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/docs/developer/release-
>>>> process.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It will need to be refined a little here and there, but the majority of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> text/process is now there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great work Paul!
>>>>>> I haven't really read it all in detail yet but you're covering a lot of 
>>>>>> detail
>>>>>> for sure. Very cool.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1. Looks great.
>>>>>
>>>>> As with most documentation, most of the holes will come to light when
>>>> someone tries to follow it.  What about having someone else try their hand
>>at
>>>> cutting a release on May 15th?
>>>>
>>>> Good idea - its also useful to make sure more people are familiar with the
>>>> process.
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers..?
>>>
>>> No one wants to give it a shot?
>>
>>I'll volunteer this time.
>
> Everyone ready for tomorrow?
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ate
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>
>



-- 
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com

Reply via email to