On 9/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The first rule of any practise, and particularly software development is every thing has a context, and no approach is universal.
> I apologize for ruffling feathers, but a very standard best practice > is that the Golden Master is the last beta, which was the previous > beta with a couple of bug fixes, which was the previous beta with a > couple of bug fixes, etc. I just couldn't believe that a change of > this magnitude was introduced at release time, when all previous > practices pointed to a professional software development workflow. As has been identified a couple of times now, a release candidate with this change was done a week previous. Further, leaving those tables would not improve the situation, only masks the problem. > Here's the formula we use in the multinational for which I run SD: Isn't all that different than what is done here, but as it is a small team, it has to be much more reactive. There are a lot of interesting things happening currently with in developing and testing, and it feels like a continuing evolution. With your participation it will only improve. Cheers, -- Lloyd Budd | Digital Entomologist | | Skype:foolswisdom WordPress.com | WordPress.org | Automattic.com _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
