On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:33:19 -0700, "Lloyd Budd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > The data in the tables was necessary to debug problems with migration > to the new tables. Would renaming the tables after the conversion have been sufficient (e.g., it was a matter of not losing the contents)? That might have better facilitated the needs of both test and dev, since anything that was going to break in the absence of the tables would have. But more important: what would have been the proper way to get that idea injected higher up in the chain? I knew of the schema change, but I wasn't affected by it, so I didn't actually know that the tables weren't dropped after update before RC1 (which precluded me making any suggestions in time to be useful). Is there a test-lead-like person keeping an eye on this kind of stuff (or does "digital entomologist" mean you're the guy qualified for that ;)? -- Travis In Series maintainer Random coder & quality guy <http://remstate.com/> _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
