Tim, I think the 1% fuzzy threshold is fine. But I really hope that the sum 
total of connections that use Web PKI includes mobile browsers and apps. I've 
heard anecdotally that mobile represents a large and ever-growing share of web 
use, and I think it's essential to include it.

-Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Adam Langley
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 8:09 AM
> To: Tim Moses
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [wpkops] Scope
> 
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Tim Moses <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Colleagues - As discussed, the idea is to document the Web PKI as it is
> practiced today.  Generally, that means considering product versions other
> than the most recent one from each significant supplier.  But, in order to
> keep the workload at a manageable level, we will have to eliminate product
> versions that are seldom encountered today.  Without making reference to
> specific products and versions, it's tough to come up with an objective
> criterion for identifying the versions that deserve to be documented.
> Therefore, I believe we have to rely on experts' judgments.
> >
> > As a guide, we might agree that, in order to warrant consideration, a
> technique must be involved in more than one percent of connections that use
> the Web PKI.  While we would not attempt to apply this threshold with any
> precision, contributors may appeal to it in order to justify their exclusion
> of a particular technique. Then the disputant would be called upon to
> demonstrate that the technique was more prevalent.
> >
> > What do others think?
> 
> 1% seems reasonable although, if anything, a little high. There are
> workarounds that apply to less than 1% but are, none the less,
> important. But any number 0.1%..1% seems sane.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> AGL
> _______________________________________________
> wpkops mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

Reply via email to