Hi Rick. I completely agree. It's covered in the last paragraph of the draft charter. In the near future I'll distribute an updated charter proposal. All the best. Tim.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Andrews Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 12:56 PM To: Adam Langley; Tim Moses Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [wpkops] Scope Tim, I think the 1% fuzzy threshold is fine. But I really hope that the sum total of connections that use Web PKI includes mobile browsers and apps. I've heard anecdotally that mobile represents a large and ever-growing share of web use, and I think it's essential to include it. -Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Adam Langley > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 8:09 AM > To: Tim Moses > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [wpkops] Scope > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Tim Moses <[email protected]> wrote: > > Colleagues - As discussed, the idea is to document the Web PKI as it > > is > practiced today. Generally, that means considering product versions > other than the most recent one from each significant supplier. But, > in order to keep the workload at a manageable level, we will have to > eliminate product versions that are seldom encountered today. Without > making reference to specific products and versions, it's tough to come > up with an objective criterion for identifying the versions that deserve to > be documented. > Therefore, I believe we have to rely on experts' judgments. > > > > As a guide, we might agree that, in order to warrant consideration, > > a > technique must be involved in more than one percent of connections > that use the Web PKI. While we would not attempt to apply this > threshold with any precision, contributors may appeal to it in order > to justify their exclusion of a particular technique. Then the > disputant would be called upon to demonstrate that the technique was more > prevalent. > > > > What do others think? > > 1% seems reasonable although, if anything, a little high. There are > workarounds that apply to less than 1% but are, none the less, > important. But any number 0.1%..1% seems sane. > > > Cheers > > AGL > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
