Mark> I realise that there are other CSS Q&A lists out there, but this list is
Mark> different in the sense that it is really the extension of a group and the
Mark> group's meetings. I would say that at the moment the membership of the list
Mark> these days far exceeds the attendance of our meetings, but the list has
Mark> evolved out of the group & group meetings.

That's probably what I didn't realise - that the list is an extension
of the group. Although I knew it orginated in Australia, I thought it
was more of a stand-alone list.

Mark> What would you think about a blog & RSS feed for news stuff (or would this
Mark> just be "another CSS blog")? Or two lists, one for news and one for
Mark> implementation issues? 

Personally I like lists in that I like the "push" of lists (things
come to me) rather than the "pull" of blogs/forums etc (I need to go
to them).

=================================
Just as a general comment about learning all the "hands-on" stuff,
please don't anyone get the impression that I'm against that. We all
need to learn and be shown, and I'm continually impressed by the
willingness of people on mailing lists to give their time and
expertise up for this. It's just that personally, I've learnt most
from the other two lists I've mentioned and don't, for me, see the
point of belonging to another list that replicates that. And please,
don't anyone be put off by Paul's comment on webdesign-L:

"the list-mom and most of the members seem to be arrogant elitist
techno-fascists who sneer and chide those of us further down the
learning curve"

It ain't so :)

Finally, if the concensus is that mostly people are happy with posting
about these sorts of issues (the "how-to" questions), then that's all
cool and how a list should develop. But it's good to ask questions
like mine from time to time!

Mike


*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to