|
Looks good overall thought you have a at
least one spelling error - ability to life the 10000kg load – should be
lift I would think. Anyway as for your CSS, you have a lot of
fat that can be trimmed from that as well (no need to repeat the font families
if ya put them in the body style) You do not need the “;” after the
last attribute in each style (You can remove the returns and have your list go
horizontal instead of vertical) Once all done remove all spaces between the
commas and the semi-colons and remove the rest of the returns and have one LONG
line – all of these together will trim A LOT off the size of the
stylesheet – mine by itself in a editing state with comments is over 18k
but the version I put on line is under 7k. It don’t look as pretty when
it is opened and is harder to read by a human, but it is a smaller file and
reads faster by a machine. From: Jackie Reid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all... if anyone has the time or the inclination could they please
have a decko at these pages and give me some constructive criticism... like
does it work at your end, any coding blunders etc! before i go at it hammer and
tongs and start filling the content in. (have validated it ok) Also when is a css doc too big and should be divvied up into
a couple of pages... ps: the links aren't functional as yet. Thanks Jackie |
- [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Jackie Reid
- RE: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Beau Lebens
- Re: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please theGrafixGuy
- Re: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Jackie Reid
- [WSG] Trimming the fat from CSS Nick Lo
- RE: [WSG] Trimming the fat from CSS Lindsay Evans
- Re: [WSG] Trimming the fat from CSS Lea de Groot
- Re: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Hugh Todd
- Re: [WSG] Trimming the fat from CSS Chris Bentley
- RE: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Kay Smoljak
- Re: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please Jackie Reid
- RE: [WSG] Constructive Criticism please theGrafixGuy
