> Of course, it all comes down to personal opinion!
> What do others reckon?

I suppose it really depends on what is trying to be achieved.

To my way of thinking, the clean <dt><dd> combination is more semantically
correct.

For me the <ul><li> seem to throw the semantics out a little - moreso than
the <p>.  Even though I can see it is a "list" of "fruit".

If the <p> were in the <dt> instead of the <dd> would that improve the
semantics more? (seeing the content is talking about "fruit" generically
rather than specifically?)

Then..... what about styling?  Does the list need bullets next to it?  Do
all browsers support the ability to "bullet" anything?  Are bullets on any
item part of the W3C CSS standard (I'm asking cause I dont know it all
back to front)?

You can do a lot with CSS - but you can only really work with the blocks
you have created.  Putting the <p> in the <dt> block may mean you have to
use some horrid positioning to get it where you want it (for example) OR
vice versa.

BUT..... maybe that is what you need to do semantically (i.e. remove the
<p> altogether and position it separately).


For me it always comes back to this........

"You understand the standards and known how to use them - then there is
'getting the job done'"

In my case, the latter always takes precedence over the standards because,
in the end, I have to get the job done and meet the requirements (in spite
of standards).



Gary Menzel
Web Development Manager
IT Operations Brisbane -+- ABN AMRO Morgans Limited
Level 29, 123 Eagle Street BRISBANE QLD 4000
PH: 07 333 44 828  FX:  07 3834 0828



To unsubscribe from this email please forward this email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If this communication is not intended for you and you are not an authorised recipient 
of this email you are prohibited by law from dealing with or relying on the email or 
any file attachments. This prohibition includes reading, printing, copying, 
re-transmitting, disseminating, storing or in any other way dealing or acting in 
reliance on the information.  If you have received this email in error, we request you 
contact ABN AMRO Morgans Limited immediately by returning the email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and destroy the original. We will refund any reasonable costs associated 
with notifying ABN AMRO Morgans. This email is confidential and may contain privileged 
client information. ABN AMRO Morgans has taken reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy 
and integrity of all its communications, including electronic communications, but 
accepts no liability for materials transmitted. Materials may also be transmitted 
without the knowledge of ABN AMRO Morgans.  ABN AMRO Morgans Limited its directors and 
employees do not accept liability for the results of any actions taken or not on the 
basis of the information in this report. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited and its associates 
hold or may hold securities in the companies/trusts mentioned herein.  Any 
recommendation is made on the basis of our research of the investment and may not suit 
the specific requirements of clients.  Assessments of suitability to an individual?s 
portfolio can only be made after an examination of the particular client?s 
investments, financial circumstances and requirements.
ABN AMRO Morgans Limited (ABN 49 010 669 726 AFSL 235410) A Participant of ASX Group

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************

Reply via email to