It's at a bit of a tangent but why do people think it's better to use a very non standard .htc behaviour rather than add this behaviour using standard DOM scripts. I really dont see the advantage but these HTCs seem to be most peoples weapon of choice.
Are we not trying to use only standards compliant code? I thought about it a fair bit and looked into using IE behaviours as a way to deliver Suckerfish but to me its using is offers no advantages and is non-standard. What does everybody else think? Quoting Gabriel Lago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The article thatīs now in the homepage of www.alistapart.com could be useful > if you adapt it to float the ul instead position it vertically, but probably > better is the "trick" from > http://www.hszk.bme.hu/~hj130/css/list_menu/hover/, while itīs not exactly > javascript it works in any browser. > > Hope it helps. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre > de ByteDreams > Enviado el: lunes, 12 de julio de 2004 16:15 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: [WSG] Does anybody know an expandable vertical css/js menu based > on uls? > > Nice Kyle. But I was just wondering, when you click on a link on that menu, > the bullets flash off and on real quick -- is that intentional? > > ByteDreams > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kyle Barrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 3:08 AM > Subject: Re: [WSG] Does anybody know an expandable vertical css/js menu > based on uls? > > > > http://pukupi.com uses an unordered list menu with CSS and JS. I'm only > > going one sub-level deep but deeper sub-levels are simple enough to > > implement. > > > > Kyle > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks! > > > Could one of you please point me to a vertical menu solution based on > > > css/js and semantically structured by ul/li's? > > > I'd love to have a solution that opens a sublevel-ul when clicked on a > > > toplevel navigation item. It would need 4-5 sublevels... > > > I know this is a lot to ask for, but maybe somebody knows a > > > webstandard - konform solution to that bugger ;) > > > > > > Thanks alot in advance! > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > mobile web gear | pukupi.com > > > > ***************************************************** > > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > > ***************************************************** > > > > > ***************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ***************************************************** > > ***************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ***************************************************** > > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
